10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
RE: The tariff classification of the Guided Hands® aid from Canada.
Issued September 2, 2026 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboardNY N363992 (September 2, 2026)
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 0, 1, 7, ., 2, 3, 9, 6, 8
GRI rules applied: GRI 3(b)
Product description
Images and product literature were provided in lieu of a sample. The product under consideration is described as the Guided Hands® aid, which is an assistive device intended for people with disabilities that limit hand mobility, enabling them to write, paint, draw, and access touchscreen devices. It consists of a black acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) plastic base board that has a stainless steel metal sliding rack mounted to it which guides the polylactic acid (PLA) plastic handpiece. The handpiece features a grip that can hold a pencil, pen, paintbrush, stylus, or similar utensil. Per your correspondence, it will be imported with the following components: small and large flat handpieces, small and large spherical handpieces, small and large joystick handpieces, a burlap carrying bag, a mesh handpiece bag, the Guided Hands® board, and the Guided Hands® user manual. Further,
CBP rationale
the applicable subheading will be 3926.90.9989, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for “[o]ther articles of plastics and articles of other materials of headings 3901 to 3914: [o]ther: [o]ther: [o]ther.
Full text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection National Commodity Specialist Division One World Trade Center, Suite 51.201 New York, NY 10007 U.S. Customs and Border Protection N363992 September 2, 2026 CLA-2-39:OT:RR:NC:N4:415 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 3926.90.9989; 9817.00.96 Lianna Genovese ImaginAble Solutions 175 Longwood Road South Hamilton, ON L8P 0A1 Canada RE: The tariff classification of the Guided Hands® aid from Canada. Dear Ms. Genovese: In your letter dated August 4, 2026, you requested a tariff classification ruling. Images and product literature were provided in lieu of a sample. The product under consideration is described as the Guided Hands® aid, which is an assistive device intended for people with disabilities that limit hand mobility, enabling them to write, paint, draw, and access touchscreen devices. It consists of a black acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) plastic base board that has a stainless steel metal sliding rack mounted to it which guides the polylactic acid (PLA) plastic handpiece. The handpiece features a grip that can hold a pencil, pen, paintbrush, stylus, or similar utensil. Per your correspondence, it will be imported with the following components: small and large flat handpieces, small and large spherical handpieces, small and large joystick handpieces, a burlap carrying bag, a mesh handpiece bag, the Guided Hands® board, and the Guided Hands® user manual. Further, you stated that they will be sold online through your website and via direct calls/emails to institutions that assist individuals with disabilities. We hold the opinion that it is the plastic components that impart the essential character to this product, General Rule of Interpretation 3(b) noted. As the Guided Hands® aid would be considered an article of plastic, and as it is not more specifically provided for elsewhere, the applicable subheading will be 3926.90.9989, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for “[o]ther articles of plastics and articles of other materials of headings 3901 to 3914: [o]ther: [o]ther: [o]ther.” The column one, general rate of duty is 5.3 percent ad valorem.
In your submission, you requested consideration of a secondary classification for the subject aid under 9817.00.96, HTSUS, which applies to articles and parts of articles specifically designed or adapted for the use or benefit of the permanently or chronically physically or mentally handicapped. Subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUS, covers: “[a]rticles specially designed or adapted for the use or benefit of the blind or other physically or mentally handicapped persons; parts and accessories (except parts and accessories of braces and artificial limb prosthetics) that are specially designed or adapted for use in the foregoing articles: [o]ther.” The term “blind or other physically or mentally handicapped persons” includes “any person suffering from a permanent or chronic physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more major life activities, such as caring for one’s self, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, or working.” U.S. Note 4(a), Subchapter XVII, Chapter 98, HTSUS. Subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUS, excludes “(i) articles for acute or transient disability; (ii) spectacles, dentures, and cosmetic articles for individuals not substantially disabled; (iii) therapeutic and diagnostic articles; or, (iv) medicine or drugs.” U.S. Note 4(b), Subchapter XVII, Chapter 98, HTSUS. In Sigvaris, Inc. v. United States, 227 F. Supp 3d 1327, 1336 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2017), aff’d, 899 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2018), the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) explained that “specially” means “to an extent greater than in other cases or towards others” and “designed” means something that is “done, performed, or made with purpose and intent often despite an appearance of being accidental, spontaneous, or natural.” We must first evaluate “for whose, if anyone’s, use and benefit is the article specially designed,” and then, whether “those persons [are] physically handicapped.” Sigvaris, 899 F.3d at 1314. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) clarified in Sigvaris, 899 F.3d at 1314-15 that to be “specially designed,” the merchandise “must be intended for the use or benefit of a specific class of persons to an extent greater than for the use or benefit of others” and adopted the five factors used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP): (1) the physical properties of the article itself (i.e., whether the article is easily distinguishable by properties of the design, form, and the corresponding use specific to this unique design, from articles useful to non-handicapped persons); (2) whether any characteristics are present that create a substantial probability of use by the chronically handicapped so that the article is easily distinguishable from articles useful to the general public and any use thereof by the general public is so improbable that it would be fugitive; (3) whether articles are imported by manufacturers or distributors recognized or proven to be involved in this class or kind of articles for the handicapped; (4) whether the articles are sold in specialty stores which serve handicapped individuals; and, (5) whether the condition of the articles at the time of importation indicates that these articles are for the handicapped. Based on the information provided, it is the opinion of this office that the Guided Hands® aid under consideration is specifically designed for use by the handicapped for secondary classification purposes. In our view, they satisfy the description set forth in Chapter 98, Subchapter XVII, U.S. Note 4(a). Therefore, we agree that a secondary classification would apply to this device under 9817.00.96, HTSUS, and will qualify for duty-free treatment upon importation into the United States. The duties cited above are current as of this ruling’s issuance. Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided at https://hts.usitc.gov/. This ruling does not address the applicability of any additional duties, taxes, fees, exactions and/or other charges, which may apply to the goods discussed herein. This includes, but is not limited to, tariffs and other duties as provided for in Subchapter III to Chapter 99, HTSUS. Thus, for example, in addition to the
classification stated above, the merchandise covered by this ruling may also need to be reported with either the Chapter 99 provision under which an additional tariff applies or one of the Chapter 99 provisions covering exceptions to such tariffs. For further information to assist with the importation process, please refer to the frequently updated Cargo Systems Messaging Service (CSMS) messages at https://www.cbp.gov/trade/automated/cargo-systems-messaging-service and the Trade Remedies page at https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/trade-remedies. The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic verification by CBP. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contact National Import Specialist Kristopher Burton at [email protected]. Sincerely, (for) James P. Forkan Director National Commodity Specialist Division
More rulings on the same tariff codes
RE: The tariff classification of “Grapefruit Flavored Rum” from Italy
RE: The tariff classification of polyamide based thermoplastic monofilament from Brazil
RE: The tariff classification of Bulgar Freekeh from Turkiye
RE: The tariff classification of a steel hinge pin from South Korea
RE: The tariff classification of costume from China.
RE: The tariff classification of a steel towing eye from South Korea
RE: The tariff classification of pinnies from China
RE: The tariff classification of the Eurorack modular synthesizer cases from Poland
RE: The tariff classification of an electromagnetic inspection robot from Canada
RE: The tariff classification of a model house from Argentina
Follow N363992
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.