The tariff classification of a knit terry bunting from China
Issued August 9, 1996 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 6111.20.6040
Headings: 6111
Product description
The tariff classification of a knit terry bunting from China
CBP rationale
The applicable subheading for the bunting will be 6111.20.6040, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for babies' garments and clothing accessories, knitted or crocheted, of cotton, other, other, other, other.
Full text
PD A86423 August 9, 1996 CLA-2-D:C:G27 A86423 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6111.20.6040 Regina M. Bernard HASBRO Inc. P.O. Box 1059 Pawtucket, RI 02862-1059 RE: The tariff classification of a knit terry bunting from China Dear Ms. Bernard: This classification decision under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS) is being issued in accordance with the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177) in response to your request dated July 29, 1996. A sample was received of Style # 30715, a towel wrap style bunting. The bunting is composed of 95% cotton 5% polyester knit terry fabric and features a hood and self fabric tie belt inset in each side. The bunting has a full frontal opening designed like a pocket-type flap; these edges and the edges of the self fabric ties are trimmed with a decorative seam binding. Style # 30715, designed for infants weighing up to 17 pounds and up to 25 inches in length, will be manufactured in China. The applicable subheading for the bunting will be 6111.20.6040, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for babies' garments and clothing accessories, knitted or crocheted, of cotton, other, other, other, other. The duty rate will be 8.5 percent ad valorem. The bunting falls within textile category designation 239. As a product of China this merchandise is subject to visa requirements and quota restraints based upon international textile trade agreements. The designated textile and apparel category may be subdivided into parts. If so, visa and quota requirements applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected. Since part categories are the result of international bilateral agreements which are subject to frequent renegotiations and changes, to obtain the 2. PD A86423 most current information available, we suggest that you check, close to the time of shipment, the Status Report On Current Import Quotas (Restraint Levels), an internal issuance of the U.S. Customs Service, which is available for inspection at your local Customs office. The sample is being returned to you. A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling, with its control number, should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, David F. Greenleaf Port Director Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Application for Further Review of Protest 4701-03-101514Dear Area Director:This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4701-03-101514, filed by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, on behalf of Mamiye Brothers Inc.FACTS:
The tariff classification of infants’ upperbody garment from China
The tariff classification of infant costume sets from China.
The tariff classification of infants’ wearing apparel from Macau
The tariff classification of infants’ bibs from China
The tariff classification of infants’ items from China
The tariff classification of a bath bag for infants’ wear from China
The tariff classification of blanket, washcloths, textile basket, infant hat and infant booties from China.
The tariff classification of infants’ wearing apparel from China
The tariff classification of a crib set and a pram sack from China and Pakistan.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →