J80031 J8 Ruling Active

The tariff classification of footwear from China.

Issued January 24, 2003 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 6402.99.80

Headings: 6402

Product description

The submitted half pair sample identified as Style Name “VINCE,” is a man’s closed-toe, closed-heel slip-on casual shoe that does not cover the wearer’s ankle. The shoe consists of an upper that

CBP rationale

The applicable subheading for Style Name “VINCE,” will be 6402.99.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for footwear, in which both the upper’s and outer sole’s external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is not “sports footwear”; which does not cover the ankle; in which the upper’s external surface area measures over 90% rubber or plastics (including any accessories or reinforcements); which has a foxing or foxing-like band applied or molded at the sole and overlapping the upper; which is not designed to be a protection against water, oil, or cold or inclement weather; and which is valued over $6.

Full text

NY J80031 January 24, 2003 CLA-2-64: RR: NC: TA: 347 J80031 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6402.99.80 Mr. W.J. Gonzalez Trans-Union Customs Service, Inc. 11941 S. Prairie Ave. Hawthorne, CA 90250 RE: The tariff classification of footwear from China. Dear Mr. Gonzalez: In your letter dated December 30, 2002, on behalf of your client Strategic Partners, you requested a tariff classification ruling. The submitted half pair sample identified as Style Name “VINCE,” is a man’s closed-toe, closed-heel slip-on casual shoe that does not cover the wearer’s ankle. The shoe consists of an upper that you state is made up entirely of plastic materials, a padded insole and a molded rubber/plastic outsole. The outsole has a progressively rising wedge-like sidewall that overlaps the upper by varying heights of over ¼-inch to as much as ½-inch and more at various points along the shoe’s lower perimeter. In this regard, the shoe has a foxing-like band. In a follow-up telephone conversation with this office, you stated that this shoe style is valued at over $6.50 but not over $12/pair. The applicable subheading for Style Name “VINCE,” will be 6402.99.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for footwear, in which both the upper’s and outer sole’s external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is not “sports footwear”; which does not cover the ankle; in which the upper’s external surface area measures over 90% rubber or plastics (including any accessories or reinforcements); which has a foxing or foxing-like band applied or molded at the sole and overlapping the upper; which is not designed to be a protection against water, oil, or cold or inclement weather; and which is valued over $6.50 but not over $12 per pair. The rate of duty will be 90¢ / pair + 20% ad valorem. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Richard Foley at 646-733-3042. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director, National Commodity Specialist Division

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

H237647 December 27, 2016

Revocation of NY N219385; Classification of footwear from China

N189275 November 18, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N184395 October 13, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N163535 June 1, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N140280 January 20, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N106084 June 8, 2010

The tariff classification of footwear from Indonesia

M87741 November 13, 2006

The tariff classification of footwear from China

L82735 March 18, 2005

The tariff classification of footwear from China

967128 January 18, 2005

Modification of NY J87067, dated August 22, 2003; Classification of boy’s athletic footwear Dear Ms. Kittel: This letter is in response to your request of April 7, 2004, for reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NY) J87067, dated August 22, 2003, as it pertains to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of boy’s athletic footwear from China. The footwear was classified in subheading 6402.99.80, HTSUSA, which provides for "footwear, in which both the upper’s and outer sole’s external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is not "sports footwear"; which does not cover the ankle; in which the upper’s external surface area measures over 90% rubber or plastics (including any accessories or reinforcements); which has a foxing or foxing-like band; which is not designed to be a protection against water, oil, or cold or inclement weather; and which is valued over $6.50, but not over $12.00 per pair." The determinati

L80460 November 22, 2004

The tariff classification of footwear from China

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.

Book a demo →