L82735 L8 Ruling Active

The tariff classification of footwear from China

Issued March 18, 2005 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 6402.99.80

Headings: 6402

Product description

The submitted half pair sample is a girl’s size 13 athletic-type shoe, identified as Style #141957 “Princess Lights/Bright.” The shoe has a functionally stitched plastic material upper that does not cover the ankle, with a padded plastic tongue, a lace closure, a rubber/plastic sole that overlaps the upper around the toes and a transparent plastic material “heel clip” sidewall portion that overlaps the upper all around the outside quarters at the back. The rear heel portion of this shoe lights up when the heel strikes the ground. You have provided an independent lab report that found this shoe has a foxing-like, ¼-inch or more vertical height overlap of the upper at the sole, around approximately 53% of the perimeter of the shoe. Based on the look, function and the substantial encirclement by a ¼-inch height overlap of the upper at the sole, we consider this shoe to have a foxing or a foxing-like band.

CBP rationale

The applicable subheading for the girl’s shoe, identified as Style #141957 “Princess Lights/Bright,” will be 6402.99.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for footwear, in which both the upper’s and outer sole’s external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is not “sports footwear”; which does not cover the ankle; in which the upper’s external surface area measure over 90% rubber or plastics (including any accessories or reinforcements); which has a foxing or a foxing-like band; which is not designed to be a protection against water, oil, or cold or inclement weather; and which is valued over $6.

Full text

NY L82735 March 18, 2005 CLA-2-64:RR:NC:SP:247 L82735 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6402.99.80 Mr. John J. Kenney Reebok International Ltd. 1895 J. W. Foster Boulevard Canton, MA 02021 RE: The tariff classification of footwear from China Dear Mr. Kenney: In your letter dated February 24, 2005 you requested a tariff classification ruling. The submitted half pair sample is a girl’s size 13 athletic-type shoe, identified as Style #141957 “Princess Lights/Bright.” The shoe has a functionally stitched plastic material upper that does not cover the ankle, with a padded plastic tongue, a lace closure, a rubber/plastic sole that overlaps the upper around the toes and a transparent plastic material “heel clip” sidewall portion that overlaps the upper all around the outside quarters at the back. The rear heel portion of this shoe lights up when the heel strikes the ground. You have provided an independent lab report that found this shoe has a foxing-like, ¼-inch or more vertical height overlap of the upper at the sole, around approximately 53% of the perimeter of the shoe. Based on the look, function and the substantial encirclement by a ¼-inch height overlap of the upper at the sole, we consider this shoe to have a foxing or a foxing-like band. You state that the shoe will be valued at $9.15 per pair. The applicable subheading for the girl’s shoe, identified as Style #141957 “Princess Lights/Bright,” will be 6402.99.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for footwear, in which both the upper’s and outer sole’s external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is not “sports footwear”; which does not cover the ankle; in which the upper’s external surface area measure over 90% rubber or plastics (including any accessories or reinforcements); which has a foxing or a foxing-like band; which is not designed to be a protection against water, oil, or cold or inclement weather; and which is valued over $6.50 but not over $12.00 per pair. The rate of duty will be 90 cents per pair plus 20% ad valorem. We are returning the sample as you requested. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Richard Foley at 646-733-3042. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director, National Commodity Specialist Division

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

H237647 December 27, 2016

Revocation of NY N219385; Classification of footwear from China

N189275 November 18, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N184395 October 13, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N163535 June 1, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N140280 January 20, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N106084 June 8, 2010

The tariff classification of footwear from Indonesia

M87741 November 13, 2006

The tariff classification of footwear from China

967128 January 18, 2005

Modification of NY J87067, dated August 22, 2003; Classification of boy’s athletic footwear Dear Ms. Kittel: This letter is in response to your request of April 7, 2004, for reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NY) J87067, dated August 22, 2003, as it pertains to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of boy’s athletic footwear from China. The footwear was classified in subheading 6402.99.80, HTSUSA, which provides for "footwear, in which both the upper’s and outer sole’s external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is not "sports footwear"; which does not cover the ankle; in which the upper’s external surface area measures over 90% rubber or plastics (including any accessories or reinforcements); which has a foxing or foxing-like band; which is not designed to be a protection against water, oil, or cold or inclement weather; and which is valued over $6.50, but not over $12.00 per pair." The determinati

L80460 November 22, 2004

The tariff classification of footwear from China

K85807 May 26, 2004

The tariff classification of footwear from Brazil or China

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.

Book a demo →