N106084 N1 Ruling Active

The tariff classification of footwear from Indonesia

Issued June 8, 2010 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 6402.99.80

Headings: 6402

Product description

The submitted sample identified as an infant’s training shoe, style “UA G Infant Covert Trainer,” is a below-the-ankle shoe with an outer sole composed of rubber/plastics. The upper is composed of both rubber/plastics and textile materials and features a rubber/plastics Velcro® strap across the instep which secures the shoe to the wearer’s foot. This strap is considered an accessory or reinforcement and is excluded from the surface area measurement of the upper. Since you have not provided a material component breakdown by percentage of the upper and based upon visual estimation by our office, it is our opinion that the rubber/plastics materials predominate as the constituent material having the greatest surface external surface area. The F.O.B. value is $7.25/pair.

CBP rationale

The applicable subheading for style “UA G Infant Covert Trainer,” infant’s shoe will be 6402.99.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, (HTSUS), which provides for footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics: other footwear: other: other: not having uppers of which over 90 percent of the external surface area (including accessories or reinforcements) is rubber or plastics; other: valued over $6.

Full text

N106084 June 8, 2010 CLA-2-64:OT:RR:NC:N4:447 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6402.99.80 Ms. Kim Gurski Under Armour, Inc. 1020 Hull Street Baltimore, MD 21230 RE: The tariff classification of footwear from Indonesia Dear Ms. Gurski: In your letter dated May 14, 2010 you requested a tariff classification ruling. The submitted sample identified as an infant’s training shoe, style “UA G Infant Covert Trainer,” is a below-the-ankle shoe with an outer sole composed of rubber/plastics. The upper is composed of both rubber/plastics and textile materials and features a rubber/plastics Velcro® strap across the instep which secures the shoe to the wearer’s foot. This strap is considered an accessory or reinforcement and is excluded from the surface area measurement of the upper. Since you have not provided a material component breakdown by percentage of the upper and based upon visual estimation by our office, it is our opinion that the rubber/plastics materials predominate as the constituent material having the greatest surface external surface area. The F.O.B. value is $7.25/pair. The applicable subheading for style “UA G Infant Covert Trainer,” infant’s shoe will be 6402.99.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, (HTSUS), which provides for footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics: other footwear: other: other: not having uppers of which over 90 percent of the external surface area (including accessories or reinforcements) is rubber or plastics; other: valued over $6.50 but not over $12.00/pair. The rate of duty will be 90 cents/pair + 20% ad valorem. Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided on World Wide Web at http://www.usitc.gov/tata/hts/. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Stacey Kalkines at (646) 733-3042. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director National Commodity Specialist Division

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

H237647 December 27, 2016

Revocation of NY N219385; Classification of footwear from China

N189275 November 18, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N184395 October 13, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N163535 June 1, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N140280 January 20, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

M87741 November 13, 2006

The tariff classification of footwear from China

L82735 March 18, 2005

The tariff classification of footwear from China

967128 January 18, 2005

Modification of NY J87067, dated August 22, 2003; Classification of boy’s athletic footwear Dear Ms. Kittel: This letter is in response to your request of April 7, 2004, for reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NY) J87067, dated August 22, 2003, as it pertains to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of boy’s athletic footwear from China. The footwear was classified in subheading 6402.99.80, HTSUSA, which provides for "footwear, in which both the upper’s and outer sole’s external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is not "sports footwear"; which does not cover the ankle; in which the upper’s external surface area measures over 90% rubber or plastics (including any accessories or reinforcements); which has a foxing or foxing-like band; which is not designed to be a protection against water, oil, or cold or inclement weather; and which is valued over $6.50, but not over $12.00 per pair." The determinati

L80460 November 22, 2004

The tariff classification of footwear from China

K85807 May 26, 2004

The tariff classification of footwear from Brazil or China

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.

Book a demo →