10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
The tariff classification of a travel accessory bag from China
Issued March 27, 1998 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboardC8 C85386 (March 27, 1998)
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 4202.92.3031
Headings: 4202
Product description
The submitted sample, style no. 602075 "Rose Print Lingerie Bag," is a travel bag with an outer surface of a 100% polyester woven fabric. The accessory bag opens to reveal two zipper-secured clear plastic compartments. When closed it measures approximately 12 x 10 inches and is then secured with a ribbon-tie closure. Your sample is herein returned.
Full text
PD C85386 March 27, 1998 CLA-2.1B:FO:G07 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 4202.92.3031 Ms. Kristen Gibson Bath & Body Works 7 Limited Parkway East Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068 RE: The tariff classification of a travel accessory bag from China Dear Ms. Gibson: In your letter dated March 5, 1998, you requested a tariff classification ruling. A sample was submitted for our examination. The submitted sample, style no. 602075 "Rose Print Lingerie Bag," is a travel bag with an outer surface of a 100% polyester woven fabric. The accessory bag opens to reveal two zipper-secured clear plastic compartments. When closed it measures approximately 12 x 10 inches and is then secured with a ribbon-tie closure. Your sample is herein returned. The applicable subheading for the travel accessory bag will be 4202.92.3031, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for travel, sports and similar bags; with outer surface of textile materials; Other: of manmade fibers. The rate of duty will be 19% ad valorem. Item number 4202.92.3031 falls within textile category designation 670. Based upon international textile trade agreements, products of China are subject to quota and the requirement of a visa. The designated textile and apparel categories may be subdivided into parts. If so, visa and quota requirements applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected. Part categories are the result of international bilateral agreements which are subject to frequent renegotiations and changes. To obtain the most current information available, we suggest that you check, close to the time of shipment, the Status Report on Current Import Quotas (Restraint Levels), an internal issuance of the U.S. Customs Service, which is available for inspection at your local Customs office. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. Sincerely, Jon A. Batt Port Director Detroit, Michigan
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 4701-16-100449; Classification; Israel Free Trade Agreement
The tariff classification of a backpack and a travel bag from China
The tariff classification and status under the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA), of a bow case, a gun case, a duffle bag from Honduras.
The tariff classification of swim bags from China
The tariff classification of a shopping-style tote bag from China
The tariff classification of a fishing rod case from China
The tariff classification of battery-powered toothbrushes, mirrors, carrying cases and hair trimmers from Hong Kong and China
The tariff classification of luggage organizers from China
The tariff classification of bait case from China
The tariff classification of a sling bag from China
Follow C85386
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.