850721 85 Ruling Active

The tariff classification of a man's athletic shoe from Japan or Thailand.

Issued April 3, 1990 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 6402.99.80

Headings: 6402

Product description

The tariff classification of a man's athletic shoe from Japan or Thailand.

CBP rationale

The applicable subheading for the athletic style shoe described above will be 6402.99.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for footwear, in which the upper's external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics (Note that an accessory or reinforcement stitched on top of another material is not part of the upper's external surface but the material hidden underneath is); in which the outer sole's external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is other than "sports footwear"; in which the top of the upper is below the top of the ankle bone; which is not designed to be a protection against water, oil, or cold or inclement weather; which has a foxing-like band almost wholly of rubber and/or plastics; and which is valued, we assume, over $6.

Full text

NY 850721 April 3, 1990 CLA-2-64:S:N:N3-D:347-T 850721 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6402.99.80 Mr. Shanny Kala FRACHT FWO Inc. 1895 Phoenix Boulevard Suite 166 College Park, GA 30349 RE: The tariff classification of a man's athletic shoe from Japan or Thailand. Dear Mr. Kala: In your letter dated March 19, 1990, on behalf of Asahi Inc., you requested a tariff classification ruling. The submitted sample, no style number indicated, is a man's low- top court shoe that has a functionally stitched plastic upper with plastic reinforcements and overlays at the sides, around the toes and behind the heel. It also has a seven eyelet lace closure and a two color, injection molded rubber/plastic bottom which overlaps the upper by varying heights, ranging between 3/4 inches to 1 1/4 inches, all around the upper's periphery. We consider this shoe to have a foxing- like band. We note that you have not provided a value for this athletic style shoe and we will presume, for the purpose of this ruling, that it is valued over $6.50 but not over $12.00 per pair. We are returning the sample as you have requested. The applicable subheading for the athletic style shoe described above will be 6402.99.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for footwear, in which the upper's external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics (Note that an accessory or reinforcement stitched on top of another material is not part of the upper's external surface but the material hidden underneath is); in which the outer sole's external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is other than "sports footwear"; in which the top of the upper is below the top of the ankle bone; which is not designed to be a protection against water, oil, or cold or inclement weather; which has a foxing-like band almost wholly of rubber and/or plastics; and which is valued, we assume, over $6.50 but not over $12.00 per pair. The rate of duty will be 90 cents per pair plus 20 percent ad valorem. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

H237647 December 27, 2016

Revocation of NY N219385; Classification of footwear from China

N189275 November 18, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N184395 October 13, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N163535 June 1, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N140280 January 20, 2011

The tariff classification of footwear from China

N106084 June 8, 2010

The tariff classification of footwear from Indonesia

M87741 November 13, 2006

The tariff classification of footwear from China

L82735 March 18, 2005

The tariff classification of footwear from China

967128 January 18, 2005

Modification of NY J87067, dated August 22, 2003; Classification of boy’s athletic footwear Dear Ms. Kittel: This letter is in response to your request of April 7, 2004, for reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NY) J87067, dated August 22, 2003, as it pertains to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of boy’s athletic footwear from China. The footwear was classified in subheading 6402.99.80, HTSUSA, which provides for "footwear, in which both the upper’s and outer sole’s external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is not "sports footwear"; which does not cover the ankle; in which the upper’s external surface area measures over 90% rubber or plastics (including any accessories or reinforcements); which has a foxing or foxing-like band; which is not designed to be a protection against water, oil, or cold or inclement weather; and which is valued over $6.50, but not over $12.00 per pair." The determinati

L80460 November 22, 2004

The tariff classification of footwear from China

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.

Book a demo →