The country of origin of Mary Kay Lash Intensity Mascara
Issued June 4, 2026 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
Product description
The submitted sample will beretained by this office.The merchandise under consideration is a packaged for retail sale described as “Mary Kay n eyelash mascaraLash Intensity Mascara.”
CBP rationale
substantial transformation in order to render such other country the “countryof origin” within the meaning of the marking laws and regulations.A substantial transformation occurs when, as a result of manufacturing process, a new and different articleemerges, having a distinct name, character or use, which is different from that originally possessed by thearticle or material before being subjected to the manufacturing process. See United States v.Gibson-Thomsen Co., Inc., 27 C.C.P.A. 267 (C.A.D. 98) (1940).The production process in the United States involving the blending of the ingredientsand emulsification results in a substantial transformation of the raw materials into the bulk . The filling, assembly, andmascarapackaging operations performed in Mexico do not a substantial transformation.Therefore, it is ourresult in opinion that the country of origin of the Mary Kay will be the United States.It mayLash Intensity Mascara be excepted from country of origin marking when imported into the United States, pursuant to 19 CFR134.32(m).
Full text
N361519June 4, 2026OT:RR:NC:N3:140
CATEGORY: OriginMary BradyIntercos America Inc.200 N Route 303Congers, NY 10920RE: The country of origin of Mary Kay Lash Intensity MascaraDear Ms. Brady:In your letter dated
May 13, 2026
, you requested a country of origin ruling. The submitted sample will beretained by this office.The merchandise under consideration is a packaged for retail sale described as “Mary Kay n eyelash mascaraLash Intensity Mascara.”You state that bulk mmanufactured in the United States Mexico for the ascara is and shipped to filling,and packaging operations.assembly, In the United States, raw materials sourced both domestically andinternationally are blended and emulsified to produce the bulk mascara. Afterwards, the bulk product isshipped to Mexico where it is filled into small plastic bottles (vials), capped with applicator wands, labelled,and packaged for retail sale. The finished product is then shipped back to the United States.Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), provides that unless excepted, everyarticle of foreign origin imported into the United States shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly,indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as toindicate to the ultimate purchaser in the United States, the English name of the country of origin of thearticle. Congressional intent in enacting 19 U.S.C. 1304 was “that the ultimate purchaser should be able toknow by an inspection of the marking on the imported goods the country of which the goods is the product.The evident purpose is to mark the goods so that at the time of purchase the ultimate purchaser may, byknowing where the goods were produced, be able to buy or refuse to buy them, if such marking shouldinfluence his will.” See United States v. Friedlaender & Co., 27 C.C.P.A. 297, 302 (1940).Part 134 of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) Regulations (19 CFR 134) implements thecountry of origin marking requirements and exceptions of 19 U.S.C. 1304. Section 134.1(b), CBPRegulations (19 CFR 134.1(b)), defines “country of origin” as the country of manufacture, production, or
growth of any article of foreign origin entering the United States. Further work or material added to an articlein another country must effect a substantial transformation in order to render such other country the “countryof origin” within the meaning of the marking laws and regulations.A substantial transformation occurs when, as a result of manufacturing process, a new and different articleemerges, having a distinct name, character or use, which is different from that originally possessed by thearticle or material before being subjected to the manufacturing process. See United States v.Gibson-Thomsen Co., Inc., 27 C.C.P.A. 267 (C.A.D. 98) (1940).The production process in the United States involving the blending of the ingredientsand emulsification results in a substantial transformation of the raw materials into the bulk . The filling, assembly, andmascarapackaging operations performed in Mexico do not a substantial transformation.Therefore, it is ourresult in opinion that the country of origin of the Mary Kay will be the United States.It mayLash Intensity Mascara be excepted from country of origin marking when imported into the United States, pursuant to 19 CFR134.32(m).We note that marking the m as a product of the United States is a matter under the jurisdiction of theascaraFederal Trade Commission (FTC).Therefore, should you wish to mark the articles with the phrase “Made in the U.S.A.,” we recommend that you contact at: U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Bureau ofthe FTCConsumer Protection, Division of Enforcement, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580,or at the FTC’s website, http://www.ftc.gov.This merchandise may be subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and/or The Public HealthSecurity and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (The Bioterrorism Act), which areadministered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).Information on the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as well as The Bioterrorism Act, can be obtained by calling the FDA at 1-888-463-6332, or byvisiting the website at www.fda.gov.The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description asidentified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations(CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of theinformation furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate andcomplete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do notconform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs andBorder Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodicverification by CBP.
This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs and Border ProtectionRegulations (19 C.F.R. 177).A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documentsfiled at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contactNational Import Specialist Merari Ortiz at [email protected].
Sincerely,
(for)James P. ForkanDirectorNational Commodity Specialist Division
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Subheading 9817.60.00, HTSUS; Broadcasting Equipment, Timing Equipment, and Boats related to the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games
Instruments of International Traffic; 19 U.S.C. § 1322(a); 19 C.F.R. § 10.41a(a)(1); Fiber-reinforced Plastic Cores, Wooden Boxes, Side Protectors.
Instruments of International Traffic; 19 U.S.C. § 1322(a); 19 C.F.R. § 10.41a(a)(1); BioKeeper.
The country of origin of water purifiers
The country of origin of fiber optic terminal boxes
The country of origin of an automotive alternator.
The country of origin of nickel key fob logos
The Country of Origin of an automotive starter.
The country of origin of kudzu root
The country of origin of automotive wiring harnesses
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →