The tariff classification of a Wireless Internet Protocol Access System (WIPAS) from Japan
Issued April 28, 2006 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 8517.50.9000
Headings: 8517
Product description
and Japan Radio Co., Ltd. This ruling concerns the classification of a Wireless Internet Access System. It consists of an Access Point (AP), which is an Omni or Horn antenna, an interface unit (IFU), and a Wireless Terminal (WT). It provides high-speed access to the Internet. The WP provides the interface to a customer’s personal computer (PC), through a Local Area Network (LAN) cable connection. The AP provides the access point to the service provider network and such to the Internet. It is connected to the IFU through a coaxial cable. The IFU provides the interface to the service provider network and is connected to the Internet using a LAN cable. Although this item is called a Wireless IP Access System, your letter states that the transmission signal is “transmitted” thru optical fiber cable, which then goes to the IFU, and thru coaxial cable to a main antenna. The antenna signals each terminal involved in the system (up to 239) and provides high-speed access to the Internet. Explanatory Note 85.25 (A) to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for the intent of “wireless” transmission apparatus for radio-telephony or radio-telegraphy, states: “This apparatus is used for the transmission of signals (representing speech, messages or still pictures) by means of electro-magnetic waves which are transmitted through the ether without any line connection.” As you explained in your letter, a signal is “transmitted” through optical fiber cable and coaxial cable. As such, the signal is not being transmitted through the ether without any line connection. Therefore, this is not considered a wireless device for classification purposes, but rather electrical apparatus for line telegraphy via a carrier-current or digital line system of Heading 8517 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
CBP rationale
The applicable subheading for the Wireless Internet Protocol Access System (WIPAS) will be 8517.50.9000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for “Other apparatus, for carrier-current line systems or for digital line systems: Other: Telegraphic: Other.
Full text
NY M82159 April 28, 2006 CLA-2-85:RR:NC:MM:109 M82159 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 8517.50.9000 Mr. Valery Zinger Schenker Stinnes Logistics Air Import 182-21 150th Street Jamaica, NY 11413 RE: The tariff classification of a Wireless Internet Protocol Access System (WIPAS) from Japan Dear Mr. Zinger: In your letter dated April 5, 2006, you requested a tariff classification ruling, on behalf of your clients First Avenue Networks, Inc. and Japan Radio Co., Ltd. This ruling concerns the classification of a Wireless Internet Access System. It consists of an Access Point (AP), which is an Omni or Horn antenna, an interface unit (IFU), and a Wireless Terminal (WT). It provides high-speed access to the Internet. The WP provides the interface to a customer’s personal computer (PC), through a Local Area Network (LAN) cable connection. The AP provides the access point to the service provider network and such to the Internet. It is connected to the IFU through a coaxial cable. The IFU provides the interface to the service provider network and is connected to the Internet using a LAN cable. Although this item is called a Wireless IP Access System, your letter states that the transmission signal is “transmitted” thru optical fiber cable, which then goes to the IFU, and thru coaxial cable to a main antenna. The antenna signals each terminal involved in the system (up to 239) and provides high-speed access to the Internet. Explanatory Note 85.25 (A) to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for the intent of “wireless” transmission apparatus for radio-telephony or radio-telegraphy, states: “This apparatus is used for the transmission of signals (representing speech, messages or still pictures) by means of electro-magnetic waves which are transmitted through the ether without any line connection.” As you explained in your letter, a signal is “transmitted” through optical fiber cable and coaxial cable. As such, the signal is not being transmitted through the ether without any line connection. Therefore, this is not considered a wireless device for classification purposes, but rather electrical apparatus for line telegraphy via a carrier-current or digital line system of Heading 8517 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The applicable subheading for the Wireless Internet Protocol Access System (WIPAS) will be 8517.50.9000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for “Other apparatus, for carrier-current line systems or for digital line systems: Other: Telegraphic: Other.” The rate of duty will be free. Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided on World Wide Web at http://www.usitc.gov/tata/hts/. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Linda M. Hackett at 646-733-3015. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director, National Commodity Specialist Division
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Classification of a Voice Port; Protest No. 1704-05-1000291
The tariff classification of a very high bit-rate digital subscriber line (VDSL) printed circuit board (card) from Japan
The tariff classification of Yamaha PJP-100 Project Phones from Japan
The tariff classification of three Virtual Presence Communications (ViPr) Systems from United States
The tariff classification of a mobile collaboration device (MCD) and client application software from Taiwan
The tariff classification of a personal communicator (Model Number COM-1) from Japan
The tariff classification of a wireless switch 5100 (WS-5100-WWR) from Taiwan
The tariff classification of a dynamic wavelength processor (DWP) module from Australia
The tariff classification of a digital base station from Canada
The tariff classification of a CoreStream( optical transmission system integrated line amplifier upgrade (ILA-2 module) from an unspecified country
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →