Coastwise Transportation; 46 U.S.C. § 55103
Issued January 24, 2008 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
Product description
The voyage in question involves your transportation aboard THE PRIDE OF ALOHA (“the vessel”). You will embark on October 5, 2008 at Honolulu, Hawaii. The vessel will make several stops in Hawaii before returning to Honolulu on October 12, 2008. You wish, however, to disembark during the last port stop at Maui, Hawaii on October 11, 2008.
CBP rationale
The coastwise passenger statute, former 46 U.S.C. App. § 289 recodified as 46 U.S.C. § 55103, pursuant to P.L. 109-304 (October 6, 2006), prohibits the transportation of passengers “between ports or places in the United States to which the coastwise laws apply, either directly or by way of a foreign port,” in any vessel other than a vessel built in, documented under the laws of, and owned by citizens of the United States. See also 19 C.F.R. § 4.80(a). Such a vessel, after it has obtained a coastwise endorsement from the U.S. Coast Guard, is said to be “coastwise qualified.” The coastwise laws generally apply to points in the territorial sea, which is defined as the belt, three nautical miles wide, seaward of the territorial sea baseline, and to points located in internal waters, landward of the territorial sea baseline. In accordance with Public Law 108-7, Division B, Title II, Section 211, the PRIDE OF ALOHA, is documented as a coastwise-qualified vessel providing “…regular service transporting passengers between or among the islands of Hawaii…” Consequently, you may embark at Honolulu and disembark at Maui, Hawaii without the vessel being in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103.
Full text
HQ H021923 January 24, 2008 VES-3-02-OT:RR:BSTC:CCI H021923 JLB CATEGORY: Carriers Mr. and Mrs. Ralph and Edith Garrow 1601 Cammar Dr. Wall, New Jersey 07719 RE: Coastwise Transportation; 46 U.S.C. § 55103 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Garrow: This letter is in response to your correspondence dated January 15, 2008, in which you request a ruling on whether your coastwise transportation aboard THE PRIDE OF ALOHA constitutes a violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103. Our ruling on your request follows. FACTS The voyage in question involves your transportation aboard THE PRIDE OF ALOHA (“the vessel”). You will embark on October 5, 2008 at Honolulu, Hawaii. The vessel will make several stops in Hawaii before returning to Honolulu on October 12, 2008. You wish, however, to disembark during the last port stop at Maui, Hawaii on October 11, 2008. ISSUE Whether the itinerary described above constitutes a violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103? LAW AND ANALYSIS The coastwise passenger statute, former 46 U.S.C. App. § 289 recodified as 46 U.S.C. § 55103, pursuant to P.L. 109-304 (October 6, 2006), prohibits the transportation of passengers “between ports or places in the United States to which the coastwise laws apply, either directly or by way of a foreign port,” in any vessel other than a vessel built in, documented under the laws of, and owned by citizens of the United States. See also 19 C.F.R. § 4.80(a). Such a vessel, after it has obtained a coastwise endorsement from the U.S. Coast Guard, is said to be “coastwise qualified.” The coastwise laws generally apply to points in the territorial sea, which is defined as the belt, three nautical miles wide, seaward of the territorial sea baseline, and to points located in internal waters, landward of the territorial sea baseline. In accordance with Public Law 108-7, Division B, Title II, Section 211, the PRIDE OF ALOHA, is documented as a coastwise-qualified vessel providing “…regular service transporting passengers between or among the islands of Hawaii…” Consequently, you may embark at Honolulu and disembark at Maui, Hawaii without the vessel being in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103. HOLDING The subject itinerary involves transportation aboard a coastwise-qualified vessel, therefore, your coastwise transportation is not in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103. Sincerely, Glen E. Vereb, Chief Cargo Security, Carriers and Immigration Branch
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Request for Reconsideration of CBP HQ Ruling H351104; U.S. International Trade Commission; Limited Exclusion Order; Investigation No. 337-TA-1394; Certain Liquid Coolers for Electronic Components in Computers, Components Thereof, Devices for Controlling Same, And Products Containing Same
The country of origin of electric ranges from Vietnam
The country of origin of a brake pad
The country of origin of napkins
46 U.S.C. § 55102; 19 C.F.R. § 4.80b; Continuity of Transportation; Coastwise Transportation.
The country of origin of paper towel sheets and rolls
The country of origin of napkins
The country of origin of “Cooked White Rice”
The tariff classification, country of origin, country of origin marking, eligibility under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (“USMCA”) for nonwoven filtration fabric; 19 CFR 102.21 (c)(5)
The country of origin of microwave ovens from Thailand
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →