10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
The country of origin of napkins
Issued March 25, 2026 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboardNY N359789 (March 25, 2026)
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 1201, 1150, 1982, 2006, 1290, 1992, 2018, 2026, 1993
Headings: 1201, 1150, 1982, 2006, 1290, 1992, 2018, 2026, 1993
Product description
paper in a second country did not result in a substantial transformation. Likewise, in HQ 557462, dated September 13, 1994, the operations of cutting and folding were found to be merely finishing operations, which, again, did not constitute a substantial transformation. The country of origin of the finished napkins is Indonesia. The
CBP rationale
substantial transformation analysis is applicable. See, e.g., Headquarters Ruling Letter (“HQ”) H301619, dated November 6, 2018. The test for determining whether a substantial transformation will occur is whether an article emerges from a process with a new name, character, or use different from that possessed by the article prior to processing. See Texas Instruments Inc. v. United States, 681 F.2d 778 (C.C.P.A. 1982). This determination is based on the totality of the evidence. See National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 C.I.T. 308 (1992), aff’d, 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993). In China, the napkin stock does not undergo a substantial transformation resulting in an item with a new name, character or use simply by unwinding, embossing/printing, cutting, folding and packaging. As support, we reference HQ W967997, dated October 5, 2006, in which the processes of printing, cutting and folding tissue paper in a second country did not result in a substantial transformation. Likewise, in HQ 557462, dated September 13, 1994, the operations of cutting and folding were found to be merely finishing operations, which, again, did not constitute a substantial transformation. The country of origin of the finished napkins is Indonesia. The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.
Full text
N359789
March 25, 2026
OT:RR:NC:N4:434
CATEGORY: Country of Origin Jiang Qiu Synergistics LLC 22561 Naugatuck Sq Ashburn, VA 20148 RE: The country of origin of napkins Dear Mr. Qiu: In your letter dated March 17, 2026, you requested a country of origin ruling on behalf of your client, ECO Wrap Limited, for the purpose of duty calculation and Section 301 applicability. Photos and a detailed description of the manufacturing operations were provided for our review. The items under consideration are packages of paper napkins, including “beverage napkin,” “lunch napkin,” “dinner napkin,” “tall/low fold napkin,” “off-fold napkin,” and “dispenser napkin.” The finished napkins are produced in various sizes, with widths ranging from approximately 210 mm to 430 mm and lengths ranging from approximately 160 mm to 430 mm. They are manufactured in either single-ply or double-ply, and are folded into 1/4, 1/6, 1/8, and V folds. Per your submission, the parent rolls of napkin stock are manufactured in Indonesia. You describe the paper as white or brown, with pulp produced from virgin or recycled fiber; layer:1-2; 12-21 gram per square meter. These parent rolls of tissue paper, which measure in multiple widths from approximately 210 mm to 1290 mm with a maximum roll diameter of approximately 1150 mm, are then sent to China, where the paper is unwound, embossed/printed, cut, and folded to length and width. No shaping is done. The napkins are then subjected to quality control and packaged. When determining the country of origin for purposes of applying current trade remedies under Section 301 and additional duties, the substantial transformation analysis is applicable. See, e.g., Headquarters Ruling Letter (“HQ”) H301619, dated November 6, 2018. The test for determining whether a substantial transformation will occur is whether an article emerges from a process with a new name, character, or use different from that possessed by the article prior to processing. See Texas Instruments Inc. v. United States, 681 F.2d 778 (C.C.P.A. 1982). This determination is based on the totality of the evidence. See National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 C.I.T. 308 (1992), aff’d, 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993). In China, the napkin stock does not undergo a substantial transformation resulting in an item with a new name, character or use simply by unwinding, embossing/printing, cutting, folding and packaging.
As support, we reference HQ W967997, dated October 5, 2006, in which the processes of printing, cutting and folding tissue paper in a second country did not result in a substantial transformation. Likewise, in HQ 557462, dated September 13, 1994, the operations of cutting and folding were found to be merely finishing operations, which, again, did not constitute a substantial transformation. The country of origin of the finished napkins is Indonesia. The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic verification by CBP. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs and Border Protection Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contact National Import Specialist Susana Li at [email protected].
Sincerely,
(for) James Forkan Designated Official Performing the Duties of the Division Director National Commodity Specialist Division
Ruling history
Applicability of GSP to certain gift wrapping and packaging articles; subheadings 9801.00.10, 9802.00.50, 9802.00.80; sets
Modification of NY N299096; country of origin of electric motors from Mexico; 2018 Section 301 trade remedy; 9903.88.01, HTSUS
Modification of Headquarters Ruling Letter (HQ) 563262, dated July 15,2005; Country of origin marking requirements applicable to certain gift tissue products; substantial transformation; 19 U.S.C. §1304
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Subheading 9817.60.00, HTSUS; Equipment and Goods Related to CONCACAF
The country of origin of Zonisamide Capsules, USP in dosage form
The country of origin of a fan assembly
The country of origin of a 30-Inch Extendable Fire Poker
The country of origin of three oven lamps
The country of origin of Norethindrone Acetate Tablets
The country of origin of an 18" Indexing Flat Pry Bar
The classification, marking, and eligibility under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) of suitcases.
The country of origin of an Electronic Shelf Label
The country of origin of a single-use, medical tubing set.
Follow N359789
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.