10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN MARKING OF IMPORTED METAL SHELLS
Issued January 7, 1999 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboardD8 D85948 (January 7, 1999)
Tariff classification
Product description
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN MARKING OF IMPORTED METAL SHELLS
CBP rationale
substantial transformation of the article. The case of U.S. v. Gibson-Thomsen Co., Inc., 27 C.C.P.A. 267 (C.A.D. 98) (1940), provides that an article used in manufacture which results in an article having a name, character or use differing from that of the constituent article will be considered substantially transformed and that the manufacturer or processor will be considered the ultimate purchaser of the constituent materials. In such circumstances, the imported article is excepted from marking and only the outermost container is required to be marked. See, 19 C.F.R. §134.35. In this case, the imported metal shells are substantially transformed as a result of the U.S. processing, and therefore the U.S. manufacturer is the ultimate purchaser of the imported metal shells and under 19 C.F.R. §134.35 only the containers which reach the ultimate purchaser are required to be marked with the country of origin China. In your inquiry you raise the question of having the metal shells marked “Made in USA” in China. It has been determined that it is more economically feasible to have the marking done at the time of manufacturing in China.
Full text
NY D85948 January 7, 1999 MAR-2 RR:NC:115 D85948 CATEGORY: MARKING Mr. Jim Caverly Datel, Inc. 11 Cabot Boulevard Mansfield, MA 02048 RE: COUNTRY OF ORIGIN MARKING OF IMPORTED METAL SHELLS Dear Mr. Caverly: This is in response to your letter dated December 3, 1998 requesting a ruling on whether imported metal shells are required to be individually marked with the country of origin if it is later to be processed in the U.S. by a U.S. manufacturer. A marked sample was not submitted with your letter for review. In your letter you state that the metal shells are manufactured in China with specific drawings supplied by Datel, Inc. The shells are used as outer casing for the power supplies. Datel, Inc. manufactures and sells DC/DC converters. The imported metal shells are not sold individually in their imported state, nor handled by anyone else (sub contractors, customers, suppliers, etc.). The marking statute, section 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. §1304), provides that, unless excepted, every article of foreign origin (or its container) imported into the U.S. shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and permanently as the nature of the article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. the English name of the country of origin of the article. Part 134, Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. Part 134), implements the country of origin marking requirements and exceptions of 19 U.S.C. §1304. Section 134.41(b), Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. §134.41(b)), mandates that the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. must be able to find the marking easily and read it without strain. Section 134.1(d), defines the ultimate purchaser as generally the last person in the U.S. who will receive the article in the form in which it was imported. 19 C.F.R. §134.1(d)(1) states that if an imported article will be used in manufacture, the manufacturer may be the ultimate purchaser if he subjects the imported article to a process which results in a substantial transformation of the article. The case of U.S. v. Gibson-Thomsen Co., Inc., 27 C.C.P.A. 267 (C.A.D. 98) (1940), provides that an article used in manufacture which results in an article having a name, character or use differing from that of the constituent article will be considered substantially transformed and that the manufacturer or processor will be considered the ultimate purchaser of the constituent materials. In such circumstances, the imported article is excepted from marking and only the outermost container is required to be marked. See, 19 C.F.R. §134.35. In this case, the imported metal shells are substantially transformed as a result of the U.S. processing, and therefore the U.S. manufacturer is the ultimate purchaser of the imported metal shells and under 19 C.F.R. §134.35 only the containers which reach the ultimate purchaser are required to be marked with the country of origin China. In your inquiry you raise the question of having the metal shells marked “Made in USA” in China. It has been determined that it is more economically feasible to have the marking done at the time of manufacturing in China. It is screened onto the outside of the shell at the same time your logo and product identification are marked. You also state the cost of producing a new screen, equipment, ink, and labor make processing this marking of “Made in USA” prohibitive to do in your Mansfield factory. This office cannot address the issue of marking the finished good as “Made in USA”, you are advised to contact the Federal Trade Commission as they have the authority to approve when an article can be marked “Made in USA”. The office may be contacted at (202) 326-2222. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. Part 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Melvyn Birnbaum at 212-466-5487. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director, National Commodity Specialist Division
More rulings on the same tariff codes
RE: The country of origin of a pencil tire gauge
RE: The country of origin of air tool filters
RE: The country of origin of a pressure gauge
RE: The country of origin of helical coil springs
RE: The country of origin and marking of nonalloy steel oil country tubular goods and nonalloy steel oil country tubular goods with couplings
RE: The country of origin of marking of alloy steel oil country tubular goods and nonalloy steel couplings
RE: The country of origin, marking, and applicable trade programs for adhesive paper labels
RE: The country of origin of an automotive headlight switch assembly
RE: Ruling Request; U.S. International Trade Commission; Limited Exclusion Order; Investigation No. 337-TA-1392; Certain Oil Vaporizing Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same
RE: The country of origin marking of outdoor lamp kits
Follow D85948
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.