7 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.

Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.

953531 95 Ruling Active

Reconsideration of Headquarters Ruling Letter (HQRL) 086173, dated March 29, 1990.

Issued June 4, 1993 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Cite this ruling

Copies to clipboard

95 953531 (June 4, 1993)

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 2932.90.4100

Headings: 2932

Product description

It is your contention that the above ruling was wrong and that PBO should be classified as a pesticide in subheading 2932.90.20, HTSUS. Also you maintain that the conclusion in the ruling that PBO is only used as a synergist and never alone as a pesticide was in error. While you acknowledge that one of the major uses of PBO is as a synergist, you claim that it is also an effective acaricide, has considerable insecticidal activity and is used as a growth regulator. In support of your position you submitted several excerpts from the technical literature, dating back to 1947, illustrating PBO's insecticidal action.

CBP rationale

On review of the ruling in question, apparently we did err in stating that PBO appeared to have no pesticidal activity when used alone. However, even while acknowledging that it does possess some insecticidal properties, we do not believe that this is its primary use. The test for classification of PBO in the tariff as a pesticide is not whether it has any pesticidal activity but whether it is currently predominantly used as a pesticide. It is noted that many of the authorities you cited not only mentioned PBO's use as a pesticide but also its synergistic use. A synergist is defined as a material which enhances the remedial efficiency of a therapeutically active agent, or the effective- ness of an insecticide, fungicide, or similar biological agent. The Condensed Chemical Dictionary. A synergist for tariff classification purposes is not a pesticide. In fact, a review of the more recent technical literature on PBO shows that the most common use is as a synergist. Piperonyl Butoxide is defined as an insecticide synergist, especially for pyrethoids and rotenone. The Merck Index - Eleventh Edition (1989). Therefore, even though PBO may have pesticidal activity, the preferred commercial use is as a synergist. Thus, we remain of the opinion that it is correctly classifiable in subheading 2932.90.4100, HTSUS.

Full text

HQ 953531 June 4,1993 CLA-2 CO:R:C:F 953531 JGH CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 2932.90.4100 Mr. Paul A. Keane Keane and Associates International Marketing 7 East Chestnut Chicago, Illinois 60611 RE: Reconsideration of Headquarters Ruling Letter (HQRL) 086173, dated March 29, 1990. Dear Mr. Keane: Your letter of February 25, 1993, concerns the classification of piperonyl butoxide (PBO) under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). In the above-cited ruling this chemical was classified as an other aromatic, heterocyclic compound with hetero-atoms only, in subheading 2932.90.4100, HTSUS. FACTS: It is your contention that the above ruling was wrong and that PBO should be classified as a pesticide in subheading 2932.90.20, HTSUS. Also you maintain that the conclusion in the ruling that PBO is only used as a synergist and never alone as a pesticide was in error. While you acknowledge that one of the major uses of PBO is as a synergist, you claim that it is also an effective acaricide, has considerable insecticidal activity and is used as a growth regulator. In support of your position you submitted several excerpts from the technical literature, dating back to 1947, illustrating PBO's insecticidal action. ISSUE: Classification of PBO in the HTSUS. - 2 - LAW AND ANALYSIS: On review of the ruling in question, apparently we did err in stating that PBO appeared to have no pesticidal activity when used alone. However, even while acknowledging that it does possess some insecticidal properties, we do not believe that this is its primary use. The test for classification of PBO in the tariff as a pesticide is not whether it has any pesticidal activity but whether it is currently predominantly used as a pesticide. It is noted that many of the authorities you cited not only mentioned PBO's use as a pesticide but also its synergistic use. A synergist is defined as a material which enhances the remedial efficiency of a therapeutically active agent, or the effective- ness of an insecticide, fungicide, or similar biological agent. The Condensed Chemical Dictionary. A synergist for tariff classification purposes is not a pesticide. In fact, a review of the more recent technical literature on PBO shows that the most common use is as a synergist. Piperonyl Butoxide is defined as an insecticide synergist, especially for pyrethoids and rotenone. The Merck Index - Eleventh Edition (1989). Therefore, even though PBO may have pesticidal activity, the preferred commercial use is as a synergist. Thus, we remain of the opinion that it is correctly classifiable in subheading 2932.90.4100, HTSUS. HOLDING: HQRL 086173 is affirmed. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division cc- NIS Bill Winters

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

Follow 953531

Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.

One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.