The tariff classification of a camera bag from China.
Issued August 3, 1992 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 4202.92.9040
Headings: 4202
Product description
The bag features an adjustable textile belt designed to be worn around the waist. The belt is secured by means of a plastic slide lock fastener. The front of the bag features the "Optex" trademark.
CBP rationale
The applicable subheading for item VA31, the camera bag of (PVC) plastic, will be 4202.92.9040, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for Trunks, suitcases, camera cases and similar containers, other, other, other.
Full text
NY 876652 August 3, 1992 CLA-2-42:S:N:N3H:341 876652 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 4202.92.9040 Ms. Donna Witkowski Panalpina, Inc. 500 E. Thorndale Ave. - Suite H Wood Dale, IL 60191 RE: The tariff classification of a camera bag from China. Dear Ms. Witkowski: In your letter dated July 17, 1992, on behalf of Gentec International, you requested a tariff classification ruling on a camera bag. The sample submitted, item VA31, is a camera bag constructed with an exterior surface of (PVC) plastic with a textile lining. The bag features an adjustable textile belt designed to be worn around the waist. The belt is secured by means of a plastic slide lock fastener. The front of the bag features the "Optex" trademark. The applicable subheading for item VA31, the camera bag of (PVC) plastic, will be 4202.92.9040, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for Trunks, suitcases, camera cases and similar containers, other, other, other. The duty rate will be 20 percent ad valorem. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Reconsideration of HQ 959668; Classification and Country of Origin Determination for Cookware Carrying Cases; SGI, Incorporated v. United States, 122 F.3d 1468 (Fed. Cir. 1997); 6307.90, HTSUS; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2) and (e); Country in Which Fabric Comprising the Good was Formed by Fabric- making Process
The tariff classification of an insulated lunch bag from China.
The tariff classification of a container of a kind similar to holsters and sheaths of Heading 4202 from China.
The tariff classification of a backpack and a notebook computer case from China.
The tariff classification of a soft-sided vinyl collapsible insulated cooler bag from China
The tariff classification of an insulated casserole dish caddie bag from China.
The tariff classification of an insulated cooler bag from China.
The tariff classification of gun carrying cases from China.
The tariff classification of a lap top computer bag and a carrying bag from China and/or Taiwan.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →