W557456 W5 Ruling Active

Eligibility of a pigment quality quinacridone for a partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS

Issued December 30, 1993 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 9802.00.50

Headings: 9802

Product description

The exported material is dimethyl-dihydro-quinacridone ("DDQA"), an uncolored chemical of a non-pigment quality and large particle sizes, made in the U.S., which will be sent to Mexico for the purpose of changing it to a material with pigment quality. In Mexico, DDQA will be dissolved in a process solvent. A process aiding chemical and an antiflocculating agent will be added to the solution. DDQA will be oxidized and become dimethyl quinacridone ("DQA"). The DQA will be drowned (pumped into a non-solvent) and precipitated as small particle sized material (pigmentary particles). The slurry will be filtered, dried and micro­ pulverized. The dry pigment powder will be packaged and shipped back to the U.S. as Magenta RT-115-D. The process solvent will be recovered and reused many times. In an oral communication with this office, you have advised that the exported DDQA is not a completed product but must be further processed in order to be functional.

CBP rationale

Subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, provides a partial duty exemption for articles returned to the U.S. after having been exported to be advanced in value or improved in condition by means of repairs or alterations. Such articles are dutiable only upon the value of the foreign repairs or alterations, provided the documentary requirements of section 10.8, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 10.8), are satisfied. However, the application of this tariff provision is precluded where the operations performed abroad result in articles with new or different uses or characteristics, or where the foreign operations constitute a part of a manufacturing process begun in the U.S. See A.F. Burstrom v. United States. 44 CCPA 27, C.A.D. 631 (1956); Guardian Industries Corporation v. U.S., 3 C.I.T. 9 (1982). Tariff treatment under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, is also precluded where the exported articles are incomplete for their intended use prior to the foreign processing. Guardian. Congress did not intend to permit uncompleted articles to be exported abroad and there made into finished products and when returned to be subject to duties only on the cost of the so-called alterations. U.S. v. J.D. Richardson Co., 36 CCPA 15, C.A.D. 390 (1948). It is apparent from a description of the processing performed abroad, resulting in a small particle sized pigment-quality quinacridone, that the exported material, a large particle sized, non-pigment quality quinacridone, is not complete for its intended use as a pigment when exported to Mexico. The exported material also lacks certain significant characteristics of the imported product, primarily its pigment quality, and the identity of the returned product, DQA, in a powdered form, is clearly distinct from the exported DDQA. The operations to be performed in Mexico, which result in the completed DQA, constitute part of a manufacturing process commenced in the U.S. Accordingly, since the statute contemplates alterations or repairs only on articles that are complete for their use upon exportation, the imported DQA will not be eligible for the partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, upon its return to the U.S.

Full text

HQ W557456 December 30, 1993 CLA-2 CO:R:C:S W557456 BLS CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 9802.00.50 Ms. Eva M. Vary Ciba-Geigy Corporation Pigments Division 335 Water Street Newport, Delaware 19804-2434  RE: Eligibility of a pigment quality quinacridone for a partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS Dear Ms. Vary: This is in reference to your letter dated June 10, 1993, and subsequent correspondence, requesting a ruling that U.S. manufactured quinacridone, sent to Mexico for further processing, will be eligible for the partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, (HTSUS), upon return to the U.S. FACTS: The exported material is dimethyl-dihydro-quinacridone ("DDQA"), an uncolored chemical of a non-pigment quality and large particle sizes, made in the U.S., which will be sent to Mexico for the purpose of changing it to a material with pigment quality. In Mexico, DDQA will be dissolved in a process solvent. A process aiding chemical and an antiflocculating agent will be added to the solution. DDQA will be oxidized and become dimethyl quinacridone ("DQA"). The DQA will be drowned (pumped into a non-solvent) and precipitated as small particle sized material (pigmentary particles). The slurry will be filtered, dried and micro­ pulverized. The dry pigment powder will be packaged and shipped back to the U.S. as Magenta RT-115-D. The process solvent will be recovered and reused many times. In an oral communication with this office, you have advised that the exported DDQA is not a completed product but must be further processed in order to be functional. ISSUE: Whether the imported pigment quality quinacridone will be eligible for the partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, upon return to the U.S. LAW AND ANALYSIS: Subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, provides a partial duty exemption for articles returned to the U.S. after having been exported to be advanced in value or improved in condition by means of repairs or alterations. Such articles are dutiable only upon the value of the foreign repairs or alterations, provided the documentary requirements of section 10.8, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 10.8), are satisfied. However, the application of this tariff provision is precluded where the operations performed abroad result in articles with new or different uses or characteristics, or where the foreign operations constitute a part of a manufacturing process begun in the U.S. See A.F. Burstrom v. United States. 44 CCPA 27, C.A.D. 631 (1956); Guardian Industries Corporation v. U.S., 3 C.I.T. 9 (1982). Tariff treatment under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, is also precluded where the exported articles are incomplete for their intended use prior to the foreign processing. Guardian. Congress did not intend to permit uncompleted articles to be exported abroad and there made into finished products and when returned to be subject to duties only on the cost of the so-called alterations. U.S. v. J.D. Richardson Co., 36 CCPA 15, C.A.D. 390 (1948). It is apparent from a description of the processing performed abroad, resulting in a small particle sized pigment-quality quinacridone, that the exported material, a large particle sized, non-pigment quality quinacridone, is not complete for its intended use as a pigment when exported to Mexico. The exported material also lacks certain significant characteristics of the imported product, primarily its pigment quality, and the identity of the returned product, DQA, in a powdered form, is clearly distinct from the exported DDQA. The operations to be performed in Mexico, which result in the completed DQA, constitute part of a manufacturing process commenced in the U.S. Accordingly, since the statute contemplates alterations or repairs only on articles that are complete for their use upon exportation, the imported DQA will not be eligible for the partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, upon its return to the U.S. HOLDING: The imported pigment quality quinacriodone (dimethyl quinacridone) will not be eligible for the partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, upon return to the U.S. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

N357726 February 9, 2026

-importation into the United States provided the documentary requirements of 19 CFR 181.64 are satisfied. The duties cited above are current as of this ruling’s issuance. Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided at https//hts.usitc.gov/. The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Custom

N353145 September 26, 2025

Applicability of 9817.00.98 and 9802.00.50 to costumes imported from Canada

H348824 August 27, 2025

Network Security Device; Country of Origin; Marking; 9802.00.50; 9802.00.80

N344700 January 13, 2025

The tariff classification and applicability of 9802.00.50 to steel tubing exported from the United States            (U.S.), sent to Canada for additional processing, and returned to the U.S.

N339565 April 23, 2024

The tariff classification of plastic portable water pet bowls and pencils from China with logos added in Mexico

H335651 December 27, 2023

Subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, Wooden Flooring

H328190 February 2, 2023

Country of Origin; Subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS; Section 301 Trade Remedy

H311202 January 5, 2023

Subheadings 9801.00.10, 9801.00.20, 9802.00.50, HTSUS; Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2506-20-100243; Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.

H325232 June 27, 2022

Refurbished solar panels; Subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS

H321591 November 3, 2021

Applicability of subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS; Algal Oil

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.

Book a demo →