10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.

Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.

N363608 New York Ruling Active

The country of origin of HDMI cable assemblies

Issued August 4, 2026 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Cite this ruling

Copies to clipboard

NY N363608 (August 4, 2026)

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 2018, 1201, 1992, 2026, 1993, 1982

Headings: 2018, 1201, 1992, 2026, 1993, 1982

Product description

There are two HDMI cable assemblies at issue in this request, individually identified by model names 0.75M 48G Pearl Passive HDMI Assembly and 1.5M 48G Pearl Passive HDMI Assembly. Both HDMI cable assemblies are identical except for the variation in length. Both HDMI cable assemblies consist of insulated electrical conductors with HDMI Type-A style connectors attached to each end. In use, the subject HDMI cable assemblies are used to transmit audio and video signals between devices such as televisions, monitors, and other media enabled devices. In your request,

CBP rationale

substantial transformation analysis is applicable. See, e.g., Headquarters Ruling Letter H301619, dated November 6, 2018. The test for determining whether a substantial transformation will occur is whether an article emerges from a process with a new name, character, or use different from that possessed by the article prior to processing. See Texas Instruments Inc. v. United States, 681 F.2d 778 (C.C.P.A. 1982). This determination is based on the totality of the evidence. See National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 C.I.T. 308 (1992), aff’d, 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Regarding the country of origin of the subject HDMI cable assemblies, it is our opinion that the Taiwanese originating conductor wire imparts the character of the finished article as it is the essential component of the HDMI cable assemblies. The addition of Chinese origin connectors does not substantially transform the HDMI cable assemblies into new and different articles of commerce with a name, character, and use distinct from the individual components. Based upon the facts presented, it is the opinion of this office that the origin of both the 0.

Full text

N363608
August 4, 2026
OT:RR:NC:N2:220
CATEGORY: Origin Selina Lin Johnson Components and Equipments Co., Ltd. 14 Huacheng Rd., Xinzhuang District New Taipei City Taiwan RE: The country of origin of HDMI cable assemblies Dear Ms. Lin: In your letter dated July 23, 2026, you requested a country of origin ruling on HDMI cable assemblies. There are two HDMI cable assemblies at issue in this request, individually identified by model names 0.75M 48G Pearl Passive HDMI Assembly and 1.5M 48G Pearl Passive HDMI Assembly. Both HDMI cable assemblies are identical except for the variation in length. Both HDMI cable assemblies consist of insulated electrical conductors with HDMI Type-A style connectors attached to each end. In use, the subject HDMI cable assemblies are used to transmit audio and video signals between devices such as televisions, monitors, and other media enabled devices. In your request, you state that the manufacturing process begins in Taiwan, where a copper wire conductor is drawn and twisted, then insulated and covered with aluminum foil tape before a braided copper shield is applied. It is then sheathed with an insulating material prior to being cut to the desired length. The unfinished cables will then be shipped to China for the final manufacturing process. In China, HDMI Type-A style connectors of Chinese origin are assembled onto each end of the cable. Then, the finished cable is packaged for shipment to the United States. When determining the country of origin for purposes of applying current trade remedies under Section 301 and additional duties, the substantial transformation analysis is applicable. See, e.g., Headquarters Ruling Letter H301619, dated November 6, 2018. The test for determining whether a substantial transformation will occur is whether an article emerges from a process with a new name, character, or use different from that possessed by the article prior to processing. See Texas Instruments Inc. v. United States, 681 F.2d 778 (C.C.P.A. 1982). This determination is based on the totality of the evidence. See National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 C.I.T. 308 (1992), aff’d, 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Regarding the country of origin of the subject HDMI cable assemblies, it is our opinion that the Taiwanese originating conductor wire imparts the character of the finished article as it is the essential component of the

HDMI cable assemblies. The addition of Chinese origin connectors does not substantially transform the HDMI cable assemblies into new and different articles of commerce with a name, character, and use distinct from the individual components. Based upon the facts presented, it is the opinion of this office that the origin of both the 0.75M 48G Pearl Passive HDMI Assembly and 1.5M 48G Pearl Passive HDMI Assembly is Taiwan. The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic verification by CBP. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs and Border Protection Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contact National Import Specialist Gary Chaffee at [email protected].
Sincerely,
(for) James P. Forkan Director National Commodity Specialist Division

View original on CBP CROSS →

Ruling history

More rulings on the same tariff codes

Follow N363608

Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.

One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.