The tariff classification of bibs from China
Issued April 16, 2026 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 6217.10.9510
Headings: 6217
Product description
The submitted samples will be destroyed. You submitted two representative samples of style Mimi Bib, a size small (0-4 years), and a size medium-large (5-99 years) of clothing protectors (bibs). In your letter,
CBP rationale
The applicable subheading for the Mimi Bib will be 6217.10.9510, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for "Other made up clothing accessories; parts of garments or of clothing accessories, other than those of heading 6212: Accessories: Other: Other: Of cotton.
Full text
N360023
April 16, 2026
CLA-2-62:OT:RR:NC:N3:348
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 6217.10.9510
Alexander Mironov Mimi Blankets Pty Ltd 30 Miranda Place Melba N/A Australia RE: The tariff classification of bibs from China Dear Mr. Mironov: In your letter dated March 25, 2026, you requested a tariff classification ruling. The submitted samples will be destroyed. You submitted two representative samples of style Mimi Bib, a size small (0-4 years), and a size medium-large (5-99 years) of clothing protectors (bibs). In your letter, you state that all of the bibs are designed for people of all ages, and genders with permanent or chronic disabilities that affect eating, drinking, or saliva control, and provides discrete protection during mealtimes and throughout the day while maintaining dignity and comfort. Style Mimi Bib is a reusable bib. The bib is constructed from 100% cotton woven fabric. The size small measures approximately 22 centimeters in width by 43 centimeters in length, and the size medium-large measures approximately 29 centimeters in width by 58 centimeters in length. It is designed to cover the front of the wearer and is secured around the neck by adjustable snap closures. The durable bib is washable and intended for long term use. The applicable subheading for the Mimi Bib will be 6217.10.9510, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for "Other made up clothing accessories; parts of garments or of clothing accessories, other than those of heading 6212: Accessories: Other: Other: Of cotton." The general duty rate will be 14.6 percent ad valorem. In your submission you requested consideration of a secondary classification under 9817.00.96, HTSUS, which applies to articles and parts of articles specifically designed or adapted for the use or benefit of the permanently or chronically physically or mentally handicapped.
Subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUS, covers: “Articles specially designed or adapted for the use or benefit of the blind or other physically or mentally handicapped persons; parts and accessories (except parts and accessories of braces and artificial limb prosthetics) that are specially designed or adapted for use in the foregoing articles . . . Other.” The term “blind or other physically or mentally handicapped persons” includes “any person suffering from a permanent or chronic physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more major life activities, such as caring for one’s self, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, or working.” U.S. Note 4(a), Subchapter XVII, Chapter 98, HTSUS. Subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUS, excludes “(i) articles for acute or transient disability; (ii) spectacles, dentures, and cosmetic articles for individuals not substantially disabled; (iii) therapeutic and diagnostic articles; or, (iv) medicine or drugs.” U.S. Note 4(b), Subchapter XVII, Chapter 98, HTSUS. In Sigvaris, Inc. v. United States, 227 F. Supp 3d 1327, 1336 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2017), aff’d, 899 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2018), the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) explained that “specially” means “to an extent greater than in other cases or towards others” and “designed” means something that is “done, performed, or made with purpose and intent often despite an appearance of being accidental, spontaneous, or natural.” We must first evaluate “for whose, if anyone’s, use and benefit is the article specially designed,” and then, whether “those persons [are] physically handicapped [].” Sigvaris, 899 F.3d at 1314. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) clarified in Sigvaris, 899 F.3d at 1314-15 that to be “specially designed,” the merchandise “must be intended for the use or benefit of a specific class of persons to an extent greater than for the use or benefit of others” and adopted the five factors used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP): (1) the physical properties of the article itself (i.e., whether the article is easily distinguishable by properties of the design, form, and the corresponding use specific to this unique design, from articles useful to non-handicapped persons); (2) whether any characteristics are present that create a substantial probability of use by the chronically handicapped so that the article is easily distinguishable from articles useful to the general public and any use thereof by the general public is so improbable that it would be fugitive; (3) whether articles are imported by manufacturers or distributors recognized or proven to be involved in this class or kind of articles for the handicapped; (4) whether the articles are sold in specialty stores which serve handicapped individuals; and, (5) whether the condition of the articles at the time of importation indicates that these articles are for the handicapped. Based upon the information supplied, it is the opinion of this office that the adaptions are not significant enough to qualify for classification under 9817.00.96, HTSUS. The articles are not easily distinguishable from items used by the general public. Therefore, we disagree that a secondary classification in 9817.00.96, HTSUS, applies. The duties cited above are current as of this ruling’s issuance. Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided at https://hts.usitc.gov/. This ruling does not address the applicability of any additional duties, taxes, fees, exactions and/or other charges, which may apply to the goods discussed herein. This includes, but is not limited to, tariffs and other duties as provided for in Subchapter III to Chapter 99, HTSUS. Thus, for example, in addition to the classification stated above, the merchandise covered by this ruling may also need to be reported with either the Chapter 99 provision under which an additional tariff applies or one of the Chapter 99 provisions covering exceptions to such tariffs. For further information to assist with the importation process, please refer to the frequently updated Cargo Systems Messaging Service (CSMS) messages at https://www.cbp.gov/trade/automated/cargo-systems-messaging-service and the Trade Remedies page at https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/trade-remedies.
The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic verification by CBP. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs and Border Protection Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contact National Import Specialist Rosemarie Hayward at [email protected].
Sincerely,
(for) James P. Forkan Director National Commodity Specialist Division
More rulings on the same tariff codes
The tariff classification of a fashion belt from China
The tariff classification of a woman’s jacket from Vietnam
The tariff classification of a men’s belt from India
The tariff classification of mattress underpads from China and adult bibs from China and Pakistan
The tariff classification of an accessory from China
The tariff classification of textile belts from Dominican Republic and Guatemala
The tariff classification of a women’s belt from China
The tariff classification of welding bibs from China and Cambodia
The tariff classification of welding sleeve protectors from China and Cambodia
The tariff classification of sleeve protectors from China.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →