10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.

Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.

N359193 New York Ruling Active

RE: The tariff classification of three metallic solder powders from Malaysia

Issued September 1, 2026 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Cite this ruling

Copies to clipboard

NY N359193 (September 1, 2026)

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 0, 1, 7, ., 6

Product description

S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) laboratory for analysis. CBP laboratory analysis has determined that the 90iSC DAP (Type 4) and 90iSC AGP (Type 3) samples contain tin, silver, bismuth, antimony, and copper. The 97SC AGP (SAC 305 Type 3) sample was determined to contain tin, silver, and copper. The silver content for each sample is estimated to be more than 2 percent of the sample by weight, with the 90iSC DAP (Type 4) and 90iSC AGP (Type 3) samples estimated to contain more than 3 percent silver by weight. Furthermore, the laboratory determined that more than 90 percent of each sample has a particle size smaller than 0.5mm. You suggest classification of the three solder powders in subheading 7106.10.0000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for Silver (including silver plated with gold or platinum), unwrought or in semimanufactured forms, or in powder form: Powders. We agree. Note 5 to Chapter 71 of the HTSUS states that, “... any alloy containing precious metal is to be treated as an alloy of precious metal if any one precious metal constitutes as much as 2 percent by weight, of the alloy...” Note 5(c) states “Other alloys containing 2 percent or more, by weight, of silver are to be treated as alloys of silver.” Since all three solder powders contain more than 2 percent silver by weight, they must be treated as alloys of silver. Subheading Note 1 to Chapter 71 states that for the purposes of subheading 7106.10, the expressions “powder” and “in powder form” mean products of which 90 percent or more by weight passes through a sieve having a mesh aperture of 0.5 mm. Because CBP laboratory evaluation confirmed that more than 90 percent of each sample satisfies this sieve requirement, the products meet the legal definition of a powder.

CBP rationale

The applicable subheading for the 90iSC DAP (Type 4) Solder Powder, 90iSC AGP (Type 3) Solder Powder, and 97SC AGP (SAC 305 Type 3) Solder Powder will be 7106.10.0000, HTSUS, which provides for “Silver (including silver plated with gold or platinum), unwrought or in semi-manufactured forms, or in powder form: Powders.

Full text

U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection National Commodity Specialist Division One World Trade Center, Suite 51.201 New York, NY 10007 U.S. Customs and Border Protection N359193 September 1, 2026 CLA-2-71:OT:RR:NC:N1:126 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 7106.10.0000 Jamie Thomas Harimatec Inc. 1965 Evergreen Blvd. Duluth, GA 30096 RE: The tariff classification of three metallic solder powders from Malaysia Dear Ms. Thomas: In your letter dated February 25, 2026, you requested a tariff classification ruling. The products under consideration are fine metallic powders, identified as 90iSC DAP (Type 4) Solder Powder, 90iSC AGP (Type 3) Solder Powder, and 97SC AGP (SAC 305 Type 3) Solder Powder. The stated components include tin (CAS no. 7440-31-5), silver Ag powder (CAS no. 7740-22-4), bismuth (CAS no. 4470-69-9), antimony (CAS no. 7440-36-0), copper metal (CAS no. 7440-50-8), and nickel (CAS no. 7440-02-0). A representative sample of each item was submitted with your request and was sent to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) laboratory for analysis. CBP laboratory analysis has determined that the 90iSC DAP (Type 4) and 90iSC AGP (Type 3) samples contain tin, silver, bismuth, antimony, and copper. The 97SC AGP (SAC 305 Type 3) sample was determined to contain tin, silver, and copper. The silver content for each sample is estimated to be more than 2 percent of the sample by weight, with the 90iSC DAP (Type 4) and 90iSC AGP (Type 3) samples estimated to contain more than 3 percent silver by weight. Furthermore, the laboratory determined that more than 90 percent of each sample has a particle size smaller than 0.5mm. You suggest classification of the three solder powders in subheading 7106.10.0000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for Silver (including silver plated with gold or platinum), unwrought or in semimanufactured forms, or in powder form: Powders. We agree. Note 5 to Chapter 71 of the HTSUS states that, “... any alloy containing precious metal is to be treated as an alloy of precious metal if any one precious metal constitutes as much as 2 percent by weight, of the alloy...” Note 5(c) states “Other alloys containing 2 percent or more, by weight, of silver are to be treated as alloys of silver.” Since all three solder powders contain more than 2 percent silver by weight, they must be treated as alloys of silver. Subheading Note 1 to Chapter 71 states that for the purposes of subheading 7106.10, the expressions “powder” and “in powder form” mean products of which 90 percent or more by weight passes through a
sieve having a mesh aperture of 0.5 mm. Because CBP laboratory evaluation confirmed that more than 90 percent of each sample satisfies this sieve requirement, the products meet the legal definition of a powder. The applicable subheading for the 90iSC DAP (Type 4) Solder Powder, 90iSC AGP (Type 3) Solder Powder, and 97SC AGP (SAC 305 Type 3) Solder Powder will be 7106.10.0000, HTSUS, which provides for “Silver (including silver plated with gold or platinum), unwrought or in semi-manufactured forms, or in powder form: Powders.” The general rate of duty will be Free. The duties cited above are current as of this ruling’s issuance. Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided at https://hts.usitc.gov/. This ruling does not address the applicability of any additional duties, taxes, fees, exactions and/or other charges, which may apply to the goods discussed herein. This includes, but is not limited to, tariffs and other duties as provided for in Subchapter III to Chapter 99, HTSUS. Thus, for example, in addition to the classification stated above, the merchandise covered by this ruling may also need to be reported with either the Chapter 99 provision under which an additional tariff applies or one of the Chapter 99 provisions covering exceptions to such tariffs. For further information to assist with the importation process, please refer to the frequently updated Cargo Systems Messaging Service (CSMS) messages at https://www.cbp.gov/trade/automated/cargo-systems-messaging-service and the Trade Remedies page at https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/trade-remedies. The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic verification by CBP. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs and Border Protection Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contact National Import Specialist Yani De Leon at [email protected]. Sincerely, (for) James P. Forkan Director National Commodity Specialist Division

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

Follow N359193

Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.

One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.