The origin, marking, and eligibility under subheading 9802.00.5060 for silver earrings.

N358412
February 24, 2026
OT:RR:NC:RRTS:N4:441
CATEGORY: Origin Shanshan Liang Liang + Mooney, PLLC 2104 Delta Way, Suite #1 Tallahassee, FL 32303 RE: The origin, marking, and eligibility under subheading 9802.00.5060 for silver earrings. Dear Ms. Liang: In your letter dated February 1, 2026, you requested a country of origin ruling on behalf of your clients, AV Elegance LLC and Ethos Creations LLC. You submitted photographs, product description, and manufacturing information on a pair of earrings. Style EC-134919 is a pair of silver hoop earrings set with diamonds. Manufacturing Steps: Designing the casting setting. This is performed in India. Creating the wax model. This is performed in India. Spruing. This is performed in India. Investing. This is performed in the United States. Wax burnout (lost-wax process). This is performed in the United States. Metal casting. This is performed in the United States. Cooling and mold breakout. This is performed in the United States. Sprue cutting. This is performed in the United States. Diamond setting, polishing, and finishing. This is performed in India. The applicable subheading for the silver earrings will be 7113.11.50, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for “Articles of jewelry and parts thereof, of precious metal or of metal clad with precious metal: Of precious metal whether or not plated or clad with precious metal: Of silver, whether or not plated or clad with other precious metal: Other: Other.” The general rate of duty will be 5% ad valorem. When determining the country of origin, the substantial transformation analysis is applicable. See, e.g., Headquarters Ruling Letter (HQ) H301619, dated November 6, 2018. The test for determining whether a substantial transformation will occur is whether an article emerges from a process with a new name,

character, or use different from that possessed by the article prior to processing. See Texas Instruments Inc. v. U.S., 681 F.2d 778 (C.C.P.A. 1982). This determination is based on the totality of the evidence. See National Hand Tool Corp. v. U.S., 16 C.I.T. 308 (1992), aff’d, 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993). You propose that the country of origin of the subject earrings is the United States. We agree. The casting of the earrings in the United States provides the essence of the finished product. Setting the gems and performing final finishing does not substantially transform the castings. As a result, the country of origin of the earrings is the United States. Therefore, the finished earrings will be considered a product of the United States for marking purposes and for purposes of trade remedies. Since the country of origin will be the United States, the earrings will be excepted from country of origin marking requirements and will not be subject to additional trade remedy measures, such as reciprocal or global tariffs. The tariffs and additional duties cited above are current as of this ruling’s issuance. Your request also concerns the eligibility of the earrings under subheading 9802.00.5060, HTSUS. Subheading 9802.00.5060, HTSUS, provides a partial or complete duty exemption for articles returned to the U.S. after having been exported to be advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means, provided that the documentary requirements of Section 10, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 10.8) are satisfied. Pursuant to 19 CFR 10.8, the importer must submit a declaration executed by the person who performed the repairs or alterations and a declaration of his own containing various attestations. Articles eligible under subheading 9802.00.5060 are subject to duty upon the value of the repairs, alterations, processing, or otherwise changes in condition abroad, pursuant to Note 3 to Subchapter II, Chapter 98, HTSUS. We find the described foreign processing acceptable for the purposes of 9802.00.5060, HTSUS. Accordingly, upon reimportation, the earrings will be eligible for tariff treatment under 9802.00.5060, HTSUS, provided the documentary requirements of 19 CFR 10.8 are satisfied. The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic verification by CBP.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs and Border Protection Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contact National Import Specialist Vikki Lazaro at [email protected].
Sincerely,
(for) James Forkan Designated Official Performing the Duties of the Division Director National Commodity Specialist Division