The country of origin of TRUXIMA® (rituximab-abbs) Injection, for intravenous use
Issued January 21, 2026 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 2025, 2002, 1992, 6332, 1982, 1201, 1993, 2026, 2018
Headings: 2025, 2002, 1992, 6332, 1982, 1201, 1993, 2026, 2018
Product description
TRUXIMA (rituximab-abbs) Injection, contains rituximab, a monoclonal antibody, as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). It is a biosimilar drug to Rituxan® (rituximab) and will be imported in 500 mg vials. TRUXIMA is indicated for the treatment of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA), Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA), and Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV). In your letter, you requested a country of origin determination and indicated the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) is also known as the drug substance (DS).
CBP rationale
substantial transformation analysis is applicable. See, e.g., Headquarters Ruling Letter (“HQ”) H301619, dated November 6, 2018. The test for determining whether a substantial transformation will occur is whether an article emerges from a process with a new name, character, or use different from that possessed by the article prior to processing. See Texas Instruments Inc. v. United States, 681 F.2d 778 (C.C.P.A. 1982). This determination is based on the totality of the evidence. See National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 C.I.T. 308 (1992), aff’d, 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993). In this case, we find the processing of the active ingredient (made in South Korea) with excipients into 500 mg vials in dosage form, and the labeling and packaging operation performed in Germany does not result in a substantial transformation and the country of origin will be South Korea. This merchandise may be subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and/or The Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (The Bioterrorism Act), which are administered by the U.S.
Full text
N357241
January 21, 2026
OT:RR:NC:N3:138
CATEGORY: Origin Daejin Song Celltrion 19 Academy-ro 51beon-gil, Yeonsu-gu Incheon 22014 South Korea RE: The country of origin of TRUXIMA® (rituximab-abbs) Injection, for intravenous use Dear Daejin Song: In your letter dated December 22, 2025, you requested a country of origin ruling on TRUXIMA (rituximab-abbs) Injection. TRUXIMA (rituximab-abbs) Injection, contains rituximab, a monoclonal antibody, as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). It is a biosimilar drug to Rituxan® (rituximab) and will be imported in 500 mg vials. TRUXIMA is indicated for the treatment of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA), Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA), and Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV). In your letter, you requested a country of origin determination and indicated the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) is also known as the drug substance (DS). You stated that the API or DS, is manufactured in South Korea and that the finished vials in dosage form are made in Germany. In Germany, the API (rituximab-abbs) will be formulated and combined with excipients, filled into vials to produce the final dosage drug called “unlabeled drug product (uDP)” in 500 mg vials. Subsequently, the uDP in 500 mg vials are labelled and packaged into the finished drug product (fDP) in dosage form. When determining the country of origin, the substantial transformation analysis is applicable. See, e.g., Headquarters Ruling Letter (“HQ”) H301619, dated November 6, 2018. The test for determining whether a substantial transformation will occur is whether an article emerges from a process with a new name, character, or use different from that possessed by the article prior to processing. See Texas Instruments Inc. v. United States, 681 F.2d 778 (C.C.P.A. 1982). This determination is based on the totality of the evidence. See National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 C.I.T. 308 (1992), aff’d, 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993). In this case, we find the processing of the active ingredient (made in South Korea) with excipients into 500 mg vials in dosage form, and the labeling and packaging operation performed in Germany does not result in a substantial transformation and the country of origin will be South Korea.
This merchandise may be subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and/or The Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (The Bioterrorism Act), which are administered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Information on the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as well as The Bioterrorism Act, can be obtained by calling the FDA at 1-888-463-6332, or by visiting their website at www.fda.gov. The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic verification by CBP. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs and Border Protection Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contact National Import Specialist Judy Lee at [email protected].
Sincerely,
(for) Denise Faingar Designated Official Performing the Duties of the Division Director National Commodity Specialist Division
Ruling history
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Appraisement of Zircon from Australia; Computed Value Method
Dear Ms. Sugama This is in response to your October 9, 2025, request for a binding ruling, on PB” or “importer”) regarding the proper behalf of Kumho P&B Chemicals, Inc. (“K method of appraisement for prospective entries of bagged and bulk epoxy resins manufactured in South Korea. The importer has asked that certain information submitted in connection with this ruling be treated as confidential. Inasmuch as this request conforms to the 9 C.F.R. § 177.2(b)(7), the request for confidentiality is approved. The requirements of 1 information contained within brackets in this ruling or in the attachments to the ruling request, forwarded to our office, will not be released to the public and will be withheld from published version of this ruling. FACTS KPB is a non-resident importer and manufacturer that will be importing bulk and bagged epoxy resins into the United States. KPB produces five types of epoxy resins in liquid epoxy resins; (2) solid epoxy resins; (3) solution epoxy resins; South
Country of origin and marking of plastic and aluminum components from China to be assembled in the United States
The country of origin of Estradiol Vaginal Cream USP, 0.01% in dosage form
The country of origin of Weber liquid propane and natural gas grills from Thailand
The country of origin of a marking crayon
The country of origin of vibratory rollers
The country of origin of battery charger for power tools
The country of origin of Candesartan Cilexetil and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets USP, in dosage form
The country of origin of a thermistor
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →