10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
The country of origin of scissors from Vietnam.
Issued December 3, 2025 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboardN3 N355860 (December 3, 2025)
Tariff classification
Product description
are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic verification by CBP. This ruling is being
CBP rationale
substantial transformation analysis is applicable. See, e.g., Headquarters Ruling Letter (“HQ”) H301619, dated November 6, 2018. The test for determining whether a substantial transformation will occur is whether an article emerges from a process with a new name, character, or use different from that possessed by the article prior to processing. See Texas Instruments Inc. v. United States, 681 F.2d 778 (C.C.P.A. 1982). This determination is based on the totality of the evidence. See National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 C.I.T. 308 (1992), aff’d, 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993). In order to determine whether a substantial transformation occurs when components are assembled into completed products, all factors such as the components used to create the product and manufacturing processes that these components undergo are considered in order to determine whether a product with a new name, character, and use has been produced. No one factor is decisive, and assembly/manufacturing operations that are minimal will generally not result in a substantial transformation. This office reviewed the submitted production process for these scissors, and we agree it is like what is described in New York rulings N352762, dated September 12, 2025, and N347613, dated May 6, 2025. Similarly, these blade blanks hold the essential identity of the finished scissors and the further processing in China would not substantially transform them. As such, the country of origin for these 10-inch all-purpose scissors will be Vietnam. The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”), Section 177.
Full text
N355860
December 3, 2025
OT:RR:NC:N4:415
CATEGORY: Origin Lawrence Friedman Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, LLP 303 East Wacker Drive, Suite 305 Chicago, IL 60601 RE: The country of origin of scissors from Vietnam. Dear Mr. Friedman: In your letter dated November 7, 2025, you requested a country of origin ruling on behalf of your client, Apex Tool Group. Images were provided in lieu of a sample. The product under consideration is described as 10-inch all-purpose scissors. Your submission indicates that the production process begins with steel sheets from China that are shipped to Vietnam. In Vietnam, the blanks are formed using a laser cutting machine that cuts the precise shape of each scissor blade blank from the metal sheets. The cut blanks feature the pivot holes where the two blades are connected. At this stage, the blanks already exhibit their final shape, size, and form. The blanks are then sent to China for machine finishing. In China, the blades undergo heat treatment, grinding, coating, honing, and the injection molded handles are attached to complete the finished scissors. When determining the country of origin, the substantial transformation analysis is applicable. See, e.g., Headquarters Ruling Letter (“HQ”) H301619, dated November 6, 2018. The test for determining whether a substantial transformation will occur is whether an article emerges from a process with a new name, character, or use different from that possessed by the article prior to processing. See Texas Instruments Inc. v. United States, 681 F.2d 778 (C.C.P.A. 1982). This determination is based on the totality of the evidence. See National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 C.I.T. 308 (1992), aff’d, 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993). In order to determine whether a substantial transformation occurs when components are assembled into completed products, all factors such as the components used to create the product and manufacturing processes that these components undergo are considered in order to determine whether a product with a new name, character, and use has been produced. No one factor is decisive, and assembly/manufacturing operations that are minimal will generally not result in a substantial transformation.
This office reviewed the submitted production process for these scissors, and we agree it is like what is described in New York rulings N352762, dated September 12, 2025, and N347613, dated May 6, 2025. Similarly, these blade blanks hold the essential identity of the finished scissors and the further processing in China would not substantially transform them. As such, the country of origin for these 10-inch all-purpose scissors will be Vietnam. The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic verification by CBP. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Kristopher Burton at [email protected].
Sincerely,
(for) Deborah Marinucci Designated Official Performing the Duties of the Division Director National Commodity Specialist Division
Ruling history
Modification of NY N299096; country of origin of electric motors from Mexico; 2018 Section 301 trade remedy; 9903.88.01, HTSUS
The country of origin of scissors from Vietnam.
The country of origin of scissors from Vietnam.
More rulings on the same tariff codes
RE: First Sale; Multi-Tiered Transactions; Related Parties; Beverage Equipment
RE: Kitchen and household cleaning and maintenance products imported under consignment; Valuation under 19 U.S.C. § 1401a; Computed Value
Re: Affirmation of NY N346051; Applicability of Subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUS, to electric actuators from China
RE: Country of Origin of a Centrifugal Pump
RE: The country of origin of a metal decorative garden stake with light-emitting diode (LED) lights.
RE: The country of origin of a metal decorative garden stake with light-emitting diode (LED) lights
RE: The country of origin of an electric scooter
RE: The country of origin of a battery charger for vehicle batteries
RE: The country of origin of Valsartan and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets USP, in dosage form
RE: The tariff classification, country of origin and marking of automotive wiring harnesses
Follow N355860
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.