N351241 N3 Ruling Active

The eligibility under the Nairobi Protocol of a blood pressure monitor

Issued August 4, 2025 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 2025, 2017, 1308, 9817.00.96, 2018, 1327, 1336

Headings: 2025, 2017, 1308, 2018, 1327, 1336, 9817

Product description

Additional information was provided via email on July 22 and July 31, 2025. The Candence blood pressure monitor is said to be specifically designed for the remote patient monitoring of individuals with hypertension and diabetes. It features a large display font, a measurement reminder icon that appears on the display, cellular network connectivity, and an automatic data transmission feature. The blood pressure monitor measures a patient’s systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate. It is not commercially available to the general public and is preconfigured exclusively for use with the Cadence program.

Full text

N351241
August 4, 2025
CLA-2:OT:RR:NC:N3:135
CATEGORY: Classification Darshak Dholakia McDermott Will & Emery 500 North Capitol Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 RE: The eligibility under the Nairobi Protocol of a blood pressure monitor Dear Mr. Dholakia: In your letter dated July 11, 2025, you requested a tariff classification ruling on behalf of Cadence Solutions, Inc. Additional information was provided via email on July 22 and July 31, 2025. The Candence blood pressure monitor is said to be specifically designed for the remote patient monitoring of individuals with hypertension and diabetes. It features a large display font, a measurement reminder icon that appears on the display, cellular network connectivity, and an automatic data transmission feature. The blood pressure monitor measures a patient’s systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate. It is not commercially available to the general public and is preconfigured exclusively for use with the Cadence program. You state that the blood pressure monitor transmits the patient’s vital signs to physicians via wireless networks. In your submission, you requested consideration of a secondary classification under subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUS, which covers: “[a]rticles specially designed or adapted for the use or benefit of the blind or other physically or mentally handicapped persons; parts and accessories (except parts and accessories of braces and artificial limb prosthetics) that are specially designed or adapted for use in the foregoing articles: [o]ther.” The term “blind or other physically or mentally handicapped persons” includes “any person suffering from a permanent or chronic physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more major life activities, such as caring for one’s self, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, or working.” U.S. Note 4(a), Subchapter XVII, Chapter 98, HTSUS. Subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUS, excludes “(i) articles for acute or transient disability; (ii) spectacles, dentures, and cosmetic articles for individuals not substantially disabled; (iii) therapeutic and diagnostic articles; or, (iv) medicine or drugs.” U.S. Note 4(b), Subchapter XVII, Chapter 98, HTSUS. In Sigvaris, Inc. v. United States, 227 F. Supp 3d 1327, 1336 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2017), aff’d, 899 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2018), the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) explained that “specially” means “to an extent greater than in other cases or towards others” and “designed” means something that is “done, performed, or

made with purpose and intent often despite an appearance of being accidental, spontaneous, or natural.” We must first evaluate “for whose, if anyone’s, use and benefit is the article specially designed,” and then, whether “those persons [are] physically handicapped .” Sigvaris, 899 F.3d at 1314. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) clarified in Sigvaris, 899 F.3d at 1314-15 that to be “specially designed,” the merchandise “must be intended for the use or benefit of a specific class of persons to an extent greater than for the use or benefit of others” and adopted the five factors used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP): (1) the physical properties of the article itself (i.e., whether the article is easily distinguishable by properties of the design, form, and the corresponding use specific to this unique design, from articles useful to non-handicapped persons); (2) whether any characteristics are present that create a substantial probability of use by the chronically handicapped so that the article is easily distinguishable from articles useful to the general public and any use thereof by the general public is so improbable that it would be fugitive; (3) whether articles are imported by manufacturers or distributors recognized or proven to be involved in this class or kind of articles for the handicapped; (4) whether the articles are sold in specialty stores which serve handicapped individuals; and, (5) whether the condition of the articles at the time of importation indicates that these articles are for the handicapped. The Cadence blood pressure monitor measures and transmits the patient’s systolic and diastolic pressure and heart rate for real-time physician monitoring. It is considered a diagnostic article precluded from U.S. Note 4(b) to Subchapter XVII of Chapter 98. Accordingly, it is ineligible for duty-free treatment under subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUS. The tariffs and additional duties cited above are current as of this ruling’s issuance. Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided at https://hts.usitc.gov/. The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic verification by CBP. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs and Border Protection Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contact National Import Specialist Fei Chen at [email protected].
Sincerely,
(for)

James Forkan Acting Director National Commodity Specialist Division

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.

Book a demo →