10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
The tariff classification of footwear from China
Issued June 15, 2018 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboardN2 N297353 (June 15, 2018)
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 6404.11.9050
Headings: 6404
Product description
The tariff classification of footwear from China
CBP rationale
The applicable subheading for woman’s style # 49626 will be 6404.11.9050, HTSUS, which provides for which provides for footwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of textile materials: tennis shoes, basketball shoes, gym shoes, training shoes and the like: other: valued over $12/pair: for women: other.
Full text
N297353 June 15, 2018 CLA-2-64:OT:RR:NC:N2:247 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6404.11.9050 Mr. Gregory Watts Skechers USA Inc. 225 S. Sepulveda Blvd. Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 RE: The tariff classification of footwear from China Dear Mr. Watts: The submitted half-pair sample identified as style # 49626 is a woman’s, closed toe/closed heel, below-the-ankle, lightweight footwear. The external surface area of the upper is 100 percent non-woven textile. It has a flexible EVA rubber/plastics traction outer sole. The shoe has functional textile laces threaded through five eyelets on each side. The shoe has a foxing-like band and an overall athletic appearance. The F.O.B. value is over $12 per pair. You suggest classification at 6404.19.9060, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for provides for footwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of textile materials: other: other: valued over $12/pair: for women. We disagree. In your letter, you state the upper is of a flimsy nature. It is the opinion of this office that the upper is not flimsy. The upper cannot be easily penetrated. Although the sneaker does not possess all characteristics associated with athletic footwear, it does resemble athletic footwear in construction and styling and will be classified as such. The applicable subheading for woman’s style # 49626 will be 6404.11.9050, HTSUS, which provides for which provides for footwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of textile materials: tennis shoes, basketball shoes, gym shoes, training shoes and the like: other: valued over $12/pair: for women: other. The rate of duty will be 20 percent ad valorem. Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided on World Wide Web at https://hts.usitc.gov/current. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Stacey Kalkines at [email protected]. Sincerely, Steven A. Mack Director National Commodity Specialist Division
More rulings on the same tariff codes
The tariff classification of a woman’s cycling shoe from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from Vietnam
The tariff classification of footwear from Vietnam
The tariff classification of footwear from Vietnam
The tariff classification of footwear China
The tariff classification of footwear from Vietnam
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
Follow N297353
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.