The tariff classification of coin recognition devices from Mexico
Issued March 20, 2013 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 9031.80.8085
Headings: 9031
Product description
Its basic operation is that, as coins inserted by the user roll by, it takes account of the disturbances of its magnetic field which result in changed electrical values. As stated in your earlier letter, “Based on reference information, this data allows the device to determine the value of coins and also whether they are valid.” We understand the “reference information” to be the electro-magnetic signature of valid U.S. coins. Coins are, one by one, compared to those stored signatures. Those that do not match sufficiently are determined to not meet the correct standard and are rejected for return to the user. You propose classification in subheading 9027.80.8060, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for Other, non-electrical, physical analysis instruments and apparatus. However, your apparatus is “electrical” as defined in Chapter 90, HTSUS, Additional U.S. Note 2, and is not designed to ascertain and report physical properties of each coin. It only determines whether or not any should be rejected as not meeting the correct standard. Your item is similar in function to the MEI banknote validators, classified in heading 9031, HTSUS, and not heading 9027, per New York Ruling Letter N009267 – 114, dated April 10, 2007. They likewise rejected invalid currency (and gave credit for the appropriate amount, a much easier task.) These coin validation devices are not “optical” appliances or instruments per Chapter 90, HTSUS, Additional U.S. Note 3.
CBP rationale
The applicable subheading for these coin validation devices will be 9031.80.8085, HTSUS, which provides for "other" Measuring or checking instruments, appliances and machines, not specified or included elsewhere in HTSUS Chapter 90.
Full text
N238839 March 20, 2013 CLA-2-90:OT:RR:NC:4:405 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 9031.80.8085 Ms. Tara Newman MEI Incorporated 3222 Phoenixville Pike Malvern, PA 19355 RE: The tariff classification of coin recognition devices from Mexico Dear Mr. Newman: In your letters dated November 16, 2012 and February 22, 2013, you requested a tariff classification ruling. No samples were provided. Its basic operation is that, as coins inserted by the user roll by, it takes account of the disturbances of its magnetic field which result in changed electrical values. As stated in your earlier letter, “Based on reference information, this data allows the device to determine the value of coins and also whether they are valid.” We understand the “reference information” to be the electro-magnetic signature of valid U.S. coins. Coins are, one by one, compared to those stored signatures. Those that do not match sufficiently are determined to not meet the correct standard and are rejected for return to the user. You propose classification in subheading 9027.80.8060, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for Other, non-electrical, physical analysis instruments and apparatus. However, your apparatus is “electrical” as defined in Chapter 90, HTSUS, Additional U.S. Note 2, and is not designed to ascertain and report physical properties of each coin. It only determines whether or not any should be rejected as not meeting the correct standard. Your item is similar in function to the MEI banknote validators, classified in heading 9031, HTSUS, and not heading 9027, per New York Ruling Letter N009267 – 114, dated April 10, 2007. They likewise rejected invalid currency (and gave credit for the appropriate amount, a much easier task.) These coin validation devices are not “optical” appliances or instruments per Chapter 90, HTSUS, Additional U.S. Note 3. The applicable subheading for these coin validation devices will be 9031.80.8085, HTSUS, which provides for "other" Measuring or checking instruments, appliances and machines, not specified or included elsewhere in HTSUS Chapter 90. The rate of duty will be 1.7 percent ad valorem. Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided on World Wide Web at http://www.usitc.gov/tata/hts/. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist J. Sheridan at (646) 733-3012. Sincerely, Thomas J. Russo Director National Commodity Specialist Division
Ruling history
More rulings on the same tariff codes
The tariff classification and country of origin of an Industrial Data Acquisition Sensor Box
The tariff classification of RFID measuring devices from Austria
The tariff classification of a smart medication vial from China
The tariff classification of a Peri sensor from China
The tariff classification of a livestock monitoring system from Germany
The tariff classification of non-destructive testing equipment from France
The tariff classification of sensors from China
The tariff classification of a wearable wellness monitor from China
The tariff classification and country of origin of a smart target
The tariff classification of data loggers from China
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →