The tariff classification of footwear from China
Issued November 15, 2005 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 6404.11.90
Headings: 6404
Product description
The submitted half pair sample, identified as style “Mitnick,” is an athletic-type shoe of a light brown color with a predominately textile material upper that does not cover the ankle. The shoe has a lace closure, a wrap-around leather toe bumper, a padded textile material tongue, a molded rubber/plastic bottom that overlaps the upper at the sole and, except for the color, it looks and has all the flexibility and characteristics of a low-top canvas tennis shoe or sneaker. We consider this shoe, which the submitted merchandise/vendor form indicates is from your “outdoor sport” collection, to be “athletic” footwear. Your form also states that this shoe will be valued at over $12 per pair.
CBP rationale
The applicable subheading for this shoe, identified as style “Mitnick, “ will be 6404.11.90, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for footwear, in which the upper’s external surface is predominately textile materials (excluding accessories and reinforcements); in which the outer sole’s external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is “athletic” footwear; and which is valued over $12.
Full text
NY L88216 November 15, 2005 CLA-2-64:RR:NC:SP:247 L88216 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6404.11.90 Ms. Maristella Iacobello Phillips-Van Heusen Corp. 200 Madison Avenue New York, NY 100116 RE: The tariff classification of footwear from China Dear Ms. Iacobello: In your letter dated October 21, 2005 you requested a tariff classification ruling. The submitted half pair sample, identified as style “Mitnick,” is an athletic-type shoe of a light brown color with a predominately textile material upper that does not cover the ankle. The shoe has a lace closure, a wrap-around leather toe bumper, a padded textile material tongue, a molded rubber/plastic bottom that overlaps the upper at the sole and, except for the color, it looks and has all the flexibility and characteristics of a low-top canvas tennis shoe or sneaker. We consider this shoe, which the submitted merchandise/vendor form indicates is from your “outdoor sport” collection, to be “athletic” footwear. Your form also states that this shoe will be valued at over $12 per pair. The applicable subheading for this shoe, identified as style “Mitnick, “ will be 6404.11.90, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for footwear, in which the upper’s external surface is predominately textile materials (excluding accessories and reinforcements); in which the outer sole’s external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is “athletic” footwear; and which is valued over $12.00 per pair. The rate of duty will be 20% ad valorem. We note that the submitted shoe is not marked with the country of origin. Therefore, if imported as is, the shoes will not meet the country of origin marking requirement of 19 U.S.C. 1304. Accordingly, the shoes will be considered not legally marked under the provisions of 19 C.F.R. 134.11 which states, “every article of foreign origin (or its container) imported into the U.S. shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article (or container) will permit.” We are returning the sample as you requested. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Richard Foley at 646-733-3042. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director, National Commodity Specialist Division
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Revocation of NY N285583 and NY N299433; The tariff classification of footwear from China.
Tariff classification of the Nike Adapt BB basketball shoe
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2704-19-102962; Classification of Women’s Footwear
Reconsideration of NY N279073; Tariff Classification of footwear from China
Protest and Application for Further Review No. 0401-14-100073; Classification of certain women's footwear
Modification of HQ H012677, dated February 15, 2008; Classification of Aquatic Training Shoes
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China and Korea
The tariff classification of wrestling shoes from China
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →