Subheading 9817.00.96; Handheld Shower Systems
Issued May 7, 2015 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
Product description
are not “specifically designed or adapted for the use or benefit” of handicapped people as required under subheading 9817.00.96. As you note in your request, “probability of general public use” is an important consideration in CBP’s case-by-case determination of whether a good is “specifically designed or adapted for the use or benefit” of handicapped people. Although we agree that use by the general public does not automatically disqualify a good under subheading 9817.00.96, here the extent of probable public use is so great that the goods cannot qualify as “designed or adapted” for the handicapped. This finding is consistent with two previous rulings
CBP rationale
that similar handheld shower systems “have too high a ‘probability of general public use’ to meet the requirements” under subheading 9817.00.96. See NY R01814, dated May 17, 2005; N042600, dated Nov. 10, 2008; see also H950772, dated Mar. 4, 1992; H966791, dated Jan. 16, 2004. The general public buys and uses handheld shower systems for a multitude of reasons that have nothing to do with handicaps or disabilities. We agree with NY N264907, dated Nov. 14, 2013 that many people buy handheld shower systems because they make it easier to wash a pet or to give a child a bath, or simply because they like controlling the showerhead with their hands. Because handheld shower systems are in such widespread use by the general public, they are also not “easily distinguishable” as goods for the handicapped, another consideration that CBP weighs in its determination. Furthermore, after examining the submitted photographs and descriptions, we also agree with NY N264907, dated Nov. 14, 2013 that these types of shower systems are sold in standard hardware stores frequented by the general public. On balance, we therefore find that the Gerber showerheads were not “specifically designed or adapted for the use or benefit” of handicapped people and affirm N246907.
Full text
HQ H255450 May 7, 2015 OT:RR:CTF:VS H255450 RMC CATEGORY: Classification John M. Peterson Neville Peterson LLP 17 State Street – 19th Floor New York, NY 10004 Re: Subheading 9817.00.96; Handheld Shower Systems Dear Mr. Peterson: This is in response to your January 16, 2014 request for reconsideration of New York Ruling (NY) N246907, dated Nov. 14, 2013. In that ruling, the National Commodity Specialist Division found that four handheld shower systems imported by your client, Gerber, were ineligible for duty-free treatment under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) subheading 9817.00.96. We affirm N246907 because we agree that the four handheld shower systems at issue are not “specifically designed or adapted for the use or benefit” of handicapped people as required under subheading 9817.00.96. As you note in your request, “probability of general public use” is an important consideration in CBP’s case-by-case determination of whether a good is “specifically designed or adapted for the use or benefit” of handicapped people. Although we agree that use by the general public does not automatically disqualify a good under subheading 9817.00.96, here the extent of probable public use is so great that the goods cannot qualify as “designed or adapted” for the handicapped. This finding is consistent with two previous rulings holding that similar handheld shower systems “have too high a ‘probability of general public use’ to meet the requirements” under subheading 9817.00.96. See NY R01814, dated May 17, 2005; N042600, dated Nov. 10, 2008; see also H950772, dated Mar. 4, 1992; H966791, dated Jan. 16, 2004. The general public buys and uses handheld shower systems for a multitude of reasons that have nothing to do with handicaps or disabilities. We agree with NY N264907, dated Nov. 14, 2013 that many people buy handheld shower systems because they make it easier to wash a pet or to give a child a bath, or simply because they like controlling the showerhead with their hands. Because handheld shower systems are in such widespread use by the general public, they are also not “easily distinguishable” as goods for the handicapped, another consideration that CBP weighs in its determination. Furthermore, after examining the submitted photographs and descriptions, we also agree with NY N264907, dated Nov. 14, 2013 that these types of shower systems are sold in standard hardware stores frequented by the general public. On balance, we therefore find that the Gerber showerheads were not “specifically designed or adapted for the use or benefit” of handicapped people and affirm N246907. Sincerely, Monika R. Brenner, Chief Valuation and Special Programs Branch
Ruling history
The tariff classification of showerheads from Canada.
The tariff classification of handheld showerhead assemblies from China.
The tariff classification of plastic shower heads from China
More rulings on the same tariff codes
The tariff classification of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) devices from Taiwan
The country of origin of an automotive alternator.
The tariff classification of hearing loop drivers from the United Kingdom
Eligibility for duty-free treatment under Nairobi Protocol concerning toilet lifting device from Malaysia.
The country of origin of Candesartan Cilexetil and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets USP, in dosage form
Eligibility for duty-free treatment under Nairobi Protocol concerning the Neria™ Guard Infusion Set from Denmark.
Method of appraisement for reusable transport tanks
The tariff classification of ramp segments for accessibility ramps from China
The tariff classification of ramp segments for accessibility ramps from China
The tariff classification of insulin pump patches and continuous glucose monitor patches from China
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →