The tariff classification of two glass bottles from Italy
Issued May 7, 1998 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 7010.92.50
Headings: 7010
Product description
The product consists of two empty bottles that are made of clear glass. Each bottle features a plastic screw-on cap. One bottle has a volume capacity of 500 ml and the other bottle has a volume capacity of 1000 ml. The form and shape of these glass bottles are of a kind principally used for the conveyance or packing of liquids sold commercially.
CBP rationale
The applicable subheading for the two glass bottles (500 ml) and (1000 ml) will be 7010.92.50, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for carboys, bottles,.
Full text
NY C87137 May 7, 1998 CLA-2-70:RR:NC:2:226 C87137 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 7010.92.50 Mr. Joseph A. Lombardo Pastene Inc. 155 Beaubien St. West Montreal, QC H2V 1C5 RE: The tariff classification of two glass bottles from Italy Dear Mr. Lombardo: In your letter dated April 22, 1998, you requested a tariff classification ruling. Representative samples of the items were submitted with your ruling request. The product consists of two empty bottles that are made of clear glass. Each bottle features a plastic screw-on cap. One bottle has a volume capacity of 500 ml and the other bottle has a volume capacity of 1000 ml. The form and shape of these glass bottles are of a kind principally used for the conveyance or packing of liquids sold commercially. The applicable subheading for the two glass bottles (500 ml) and (1000 ml) will be 7010.92.50, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for carboys, bottles,...and other containers, of glass, of a kind used for the conveyance or packing of goods; other of a capacity: exceeding 0.33 liter but not exceeding 1 liter: other containers (with or without their closures). The rate of duty will be free. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Jacob Bunin at 212-466-5796. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director, National Commodity Specialist Division
More rulings on the same tariff codes
The tariff classification of an empty glass bottle from Italy
Glass bottles or similar containers
The tariff classification of empty glass beer bottles from Colombia
The tariff classification of a glass bottle from Italy
The tariff classification of five glass preserving jars from Germany
Protest 2809-96-101231; various glass containers; conveyanceor packing of goods; preserving jars of glass; glassware fortable, kitchen, toilet, office, indoor decoration; householdstorage articles; principal use; eo nominee; 7010; 7013; EN70.10; EN 70.13; U.S. Additional Note 1(a); T.D. 96-7; Myers v.United States, CIT Slip Op. 97-75; Group Italglass U.S.A., Inc.v. United States, 17 CIT 226 (1993); Commercial Aluminum CookwareCo. v. United States, 938 F. Supp. 875 (CIT 1996); Kraft, Inc, v.United States, 16 CIT 483 (1992); G. Heilman Brewing Co. v.United States, 14 CIT 614 (1990); United States v. CarborundumCompany, 63 CCPA 98, C.A.D. 1172, 536 F. 2d 373 (1976), cert.denied, 429 U.S. 979 (1976); HRLs 959639; 959941; untimelyprotest; 19 U.S.C. 1514(c)(3)(A); 19 CFR 174.12(e); Myers v.United States, CIT Slip Op. 97-75; Penrod Drilling Co. v. UnitedStates, 13 CIT 1005, 727 F. Supp. 1463 (1989), rehearingdismissed, 14 CIT 281, 740 F. Supp. 858 (1990), affirmed, 9 Fed.Cir. (T) 60, 925 F. 2
Protest 2809-96-101228; various glass containers; conveyanceor packing of goods; preserving jars of glass; glassware fortable, kitchen, toilet, office, indoor decoration; householdstorage articles; principal use; eo nominee; 7010; 7013; EN70.10; EN 70.13; U.S. Additional Note 1(a); T.D. 96-7; Myers v.United States, CIT Slip Op. 97-75; Group Italglass U.S.A., Inc.v. United States, 17 CIT 226 (1993); Commercial Aluminum CookwareCo. v. United States, 938 F. Supp. 875 (CIT 1996); Kraft, Inc, v.United States, 16 CIT 483 (1992); G. Heilman Brewing Co. v.United States, 14 CIT 614 (1990); United States v. CarborundumCompany, 63 CCPA 98, C.A.D. 1172, 536 F. 2d 373 (1976), cert.denied, 429 U.S. 979 (1976); HRL 959639; untimely protest; 19U.S.C. 1514(c)(3)(A); 19 CFR 174.12(e); Myers v. United States,CIT Slip Op. 97-75; Penrod Drilling Co. v. United States, 13 CIT1005, 727 F. Supp. 1463 (1989), rehearing dismissed, 14 CIT 281,740 F. Supp. 858 (1990), affirmed, 9 Fed. Cir. (T) 60, 925 F. 2d406 (19
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →