A87521 A8 Ruling Active

The tariff classification of rubberized textile fabric of a kind used for card clothing, from the United Kingdom and Belgium.

Issued October 15, 1996 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 5911.10.2000

Headings: 5911

Product description

You state that foundations are manufactured in the U.K. by Horsfall & Bickham and by Tiscar in Belgium. No samples were furnished or specifications of how shipped, respective weights or thicknesses, just a brochure of certain types of card clothing. Your letter mentions that Ashworth is a manufacturer of flexible card clothing used on textile carding machinery and other manufacturing processes such as, screen printing, scratching designs on bricks, embossing paper products, machines producing paint roller brushes and paint brush tapering, designs in ceiling tiles, assorted wire brush pads for the brush industry and similar products. This letter will address only the production of the material used to make card clothing foundation for textile machinery, as this is the major portion of Ashworth's business indicated in a phone conversation with Mr. Jeff Smith, of your office, and George Barth . The card clothing foundation is developed by textile material (cotton, linen, wool-linen or felt) being processed through machinery where either synthetic or natural rubber adhesive is being applied followed by the same process over and over as the thickness of the foundation (number of textile plies) has been achieved. The make-up of the foundation, how many plies of cotton, linen, etc., are determined by the end application of Ashworth. You also indicate some foundations require a rubber face. This is achieved, you say, in a long process where a thin layer of rubber is applied to a single ply of cotton and built up with multiple passes, sometimes more than 60, till the desired thickness is achieved. This one ply of cotton with the rubber face is then glued on top of the previous built-up foundation material. In your letter you write that the textile fabrics may come from the U.K., Belgium, India or Spain with the rubber mainly from Malaysia. Also, that you have had ongoing shipments through a number of Southern ports, but never any detained shipments questioning the classifica

CBP rationale

The applicable subheading for the product will be subheading 5911.10.2000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for textile fabrics .

Full text

NY A87521 October 15, 1996 CLA-2-59:RR:NC:TP:350:A87521 TARIFF NO.: 5911.10.2000 Ms. Shirley E. Wrench Union Transport Corp. 114 Southfield Parkway, Suite 170 Forest Park, GA 30050 RE: The tariff classification of rubberized textile fabric of a kind used for card clothing, from the United Kingdom and Belgium. Dear Ms. Wrench: In your letter dated August 27, 1996, on behalf of Ashworths Card Clothing, Inc., Greenville, S.C., you requested a tariff classification ruling. You state that foundations are manufactured in the U.K. by Horsfall & Bickham and by Tiscar in Belgium. No samples were furnished or specifications of how shipped, respective weights or thicknesses, just a brochure of certain types of card clothing. Your letter mentions that Ashworth is a manufacturer of flexible card clothing used on textile carding machinery and other manufacturing processes such as, screen printing, scratching designs on bricks, embossing paper products, machines producing paint roller brushes and paint brush tapering, designs in ceiling tiles, assorted wire brush pads for the brush industry and similar products. This letter will address only the production of the material used to make card clothing foundation for textile machinery, as this is the major portion of Ashworth's business indicated in a phone conversation with Mr. Jeff Smith, of your office, and George Barth . The card clothing foundation is developed by textile material (cotton, linen, wool-linen or felt) being processed through machinery where either synthetic or natural rubber adhesive is being applied followed by the same process over and over as the thickness of the foundation (number of textile plies) has been achieved. The make-up of the foundation, how many plies of cotton, linen, etc., are determined by the end application of Ashworth. You also indicate some foundations require a rubber face. This is achieved, you say, in a long process where a thin layer of rubber is applied to a single ply of cotton and built up with multiple passes, sometimes more than 60, till the desired thickness is achieved. This one ply of cotton with the rubber face is then glued on top of the previous built-up foundation material. In your letter you write that the textile fabrics may come from the U.K., Belgium, India or Spain with the rubber mainly from Malaysia. Also, that you have had ongoing shipments through a number of Southern ports, but never any detained shipments questioning the classification of the merchandise, though there have been occasional questions on the reporting units with the census copy. We are treating this letter as prospective for future shipments and again mentioning we are only addressing the classification of foundation material of a kind used for card clothing. The applicable subheading for the product will be subheading 5911.10.2000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for textile fabrics ... coated, covered or laminated with rubber, ... of a kind used for card clothing... The rate of duty is 6.8 percent ad valorem. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations. A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist George Barth at 212-466-5884. Sincerely, Roger J. Silvestri Director National Commodity Specialist Division

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

H226435 December 28, 2015

Application for Further Review of Protest Number 5201-11-100416; Tariff classification of silver plated woven fabric made of 100% polyamide filament

961537 November 21, 2000

Protest Number 3901-97-101415; Mesh Fabric; Technical Use; Bolting Cloth

E86020 September 8, 1999

The tariff classification of "Kinyo Board" press pad material, from Japan.

D88637 March 2, 1999

The tariff classification of CIEGAL, an industrial artificial leather of an impregnated nonwoven fabric, for polishing pads and other industrial applications, from Japan.

C86639 May 14, 1998

The tariff classification of PTFE yarn, packing braid, gaskets, and sealant tape from China.

A80504 August 19, 1997

The tariff classification of press board material ("Top Board") for use in hot press laminating, particularly circuit boards, etc., from Japan.

807995 March 22, 1995

The tariff classification of five impregnated yarns composed of P-84 polyamide and Hoechst aramid which are used exclusively in the production of braided packings, from Austria.

807398 March 10, 1995

The tariff classification of six impregnated yarns and one other yarn composed of PTFE (Polytetrafluorethylene) which are used exclusively in the production of braided packings, from Austria.

957059 January 18, 1995

Partial revocation of HRL 086337 (4/19/90); classification ofshielded fabric; classification in heading 5911, HTSUSA, mandatesthat the fabric be for "technical use"; the fabric must also beone of the fabrics enumerated in Note 7(a)(i)-(vi) to Chapter 59;HRL 956956 (9/23/94); HRL 952421 (5/14/93); shielded fabric usedin wall coverings, drapery, upholstery and clothing is not fortechnical use.

805335 January 11, 1995

The tariff classification of five impregnated yarns composed of PTFE (Polytetrafluorethylene) which are used exclusively in the production of braided packings, from Austria.

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.

Book a demo →