10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
Classification of decorative articles composed of plastic and plant material
Issued June 6, 2005 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboard96 967612 (June 6, 2005)
Tariff classification
Product description
Classification of decorative articles composed of plastic and plant material
Full text
HQ 967612 June 6, 2005 CLA-2 RR:CR:TE 967612 KSH CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: Ms. Yolanda Massey Michaels Stores Procurement Company, Inc. 8000 Bent Branch Drive Irving, TX 75063 Re: Classification of decorative articles composed of plastic and plant material Dear Ms. Massey: This letter is in response to your request of January 24, 2005, in which you requested a binding ruling pertaining to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of assorted Styrofoam spheres and gourds with glued on natural leaves, grass twine, cone seeds, natural cork, nut shells and natural twig. Your request has been forwarded to this office for response by the National Commodity Specialist Division in New York. Samples of the gourds and spheres at issue were forwarded with your request. At this juncture, we regret to inform you that we will not be able to issue a ruling to you on the merchandise you have submitted for classification. Section 177.7, Customs Regulations, (19 CFR 177.7) provides that rulings will not be issued in certain circumstances. Section 177.7(a) states, in relevant part, that no rulings will be issued in any instance in which it appears contrary to the sound administration of the Customs and related laws to do so. As there are conflicting rulings that have classified Styrofoam articles covered with natural materials in headings 1404, 3926, 4602 and 6702, HTSUSA, we cannot issue a ruling at this time pursuant to Section 177.7(a). Please be advised that New York Ruling (NY) K83112, dated March 2, 2004, which you refer to in your letter, is a valid ruling. However, we are currently reviewing the existing rulings on substantially similar merchandise, including NY K83112, for possible revocation or modification in accordance with 625 (19 U.S.C. 1625) procedures. Any action taken in accordance with these procedures will be published in the Customs Bulletin. Accordingly, we are administratively closing our file without further action. When that review has been concluded, you may resubmit your request for a ruling should you deem such action necessary. Sincerely, Myles B. Harmon, Director Commercial Rulings Division
Ruling history
More rulings on the same tariff codes
RE: The country of origin of a strut assembly
RE: Request for Reconsideration of NY N310029; Country of Origin; Leather Hides
The country of origin of a battery pack
Request for Reconsideration of CBP HQ Ruling H355307; U.S. International Trade Commission; Limited Exclusion Order; Investigation No. 337-TA-1415; Certain Pre- Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair and Packaging Therefor
The country of origin of Candesartan Cilexetil and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets USP, in dosage form
The country of origin of an automotive battery assembly
Method of appraisement for reusable transport tanks
The country of origin of a power bank
The country of origin of a power bank
Country of Origin of EcoSyntane; Substantial Transformation; Section 301; IEEPA
Follow 967612
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.