10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
Footwear; Leather Boot with Textile Bootie; DD 809587, modified
Issued October 6, 1995 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboard95 958474 (October 6, 1995)
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 6403.91.90
Headings: 6403
Product description
Footwear; Leather Boot with Textile Bootie; DD 809587, modified
CBP rationale
HQ 958474 October 6, 1995 CLA-2 R:C:M 958474 RFA CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6403.91.90 Mr. John B. Pellegrini Ross & Hardies 65 East 55th Street New York, NY 10022-3219 RE: Footwear; Leather Boot with Textile Bootie; DD 809587, modified Dear Mr. Pellegrini: This is in response to your letter dated August 24, 1995, to the District Director of Customs, Terminal Island, California, on behalf of The Timberland Company, seeking to correct a factual error in DD 809587, issued to you on May 18, 1995, which dealt with the tariff classification of men's boots with textile booties under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Your letter was referred to this office for a response. In your letter of April 21, 1995, you requested the classification of footwear described as a man's boot identified as Style 77300, "Mukluk Class III". Based upon the information provided, in DD 809587, dated May 18, 1995, the subject footwear was classified under subheading 6403.91.60, HTSUS, which provides for: "[f]ootwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather: [o]ther footwear: [c]overing the ankle: [o]ther: [f]or men, youths and boys. . . ." Since the issuance of DD 809587, you have brought to our attention that there was a clerical error as to the men's boots being mistakenly labeled as Style 77300. Style 77300 is the women's version of the same style boot. The correct style number for the men's boots are Styles 77000 and 77009, the only difference being color. After reviewing all the information, we find that the men's boots, Styles 77000 and 77009, are classifiable under subheading 6403.91.60, HTSUS, which provides for: "[f]ootwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather: [o]ther footwear: [c]overing the ankle: [o]ther: [f]or men, youths and boys. . . ." Goods classifiable under this provision have a column one, general rate of duty of 8.5 percent ad valorem. We further find that the women's boots, Style 77300, are classifiable under subheading 6403.91.90, HTSUS, which provides for: "[f]ootwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather: [o]ther footwear: [c]overing the ankle: [o]ther: [f]or other persons. . . . " Goods classifiable under this provision have a column one, general rate of duty of 10 percent ad valorem. DD 809587 is modified as set forth in this ruling. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Tariff Classification Appeals Division
Full text
HQ 958474 October 6, 1995 CLA-2 R:C:M 958474 RFA CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6403.91.90 Mr. John B. Pellegrini Ross & Hardies 65 East 55th Street New York, NY 10022-3219 RE: Footwear; Leather Boot with Textile Bootie; DD 809587, modified Dear Mr. Pellegrini: This is in response to your letter dated August 24, 1995, to the District Director of Customs, Terminal Island, California, on behalf of The Timberland Company, seeking to correct a factual error in DD 809587, issued to you on May 18, 1995, which dealt with the tariff classification of men's boots with textile booties under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Your letter was referred to this office for a response. In your letter of April 21, 1995, you requested the classification of footwear described as a man's boot identified as Style 77300, "Mukluk Class III". Based upon the information provided, in DD 809587, dated May 18, 1995, the subject footwear was classified under subheading 6403.91.60, HTSUS, which provides for: "[f]ootwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather: [o]ther footwear: [c]overing the ankle: [o]ther: [f]or men, youths and boys. . . ." Since the issuance of DD 809587, you have brought to our attention that there was a clerical error as to the men's boots being mistakenly labeled as Style 77300. Style 77300 is the women's version of the same style boot. The correct style number for the men's boots are Styles 77000 and 77009, the only difference being color. After reviewing all the information, we find that the men's boots, Styles 77000 and 77009, are classifiable under subheading 6403.91.60, HTSUS, which provides for: "[f]ootwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather: [o]ther footwear: [c]overing the ankle: [o]ther: [f]or men, youths and boys. . . ." Goods classifiable under this provision have a column one, general rate of duty of 8.5 percent ad valorem. We further find that the women's boots, Style 77300, are classifiable under subheading 6403.91.90, HTSUS, which provides for: "[f]ootwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather: [o]ther footwear: [c]overing the ankle: [o]ther: [f]or other persons. . . . " Goods classifiable under this provision have a column one, general rate of duty of 10 percent ad valorem. DD 809587 is modified as set forth in this ruling. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Tariff Classification Appeals Division
More rulings on the same tariff codes
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
Follow 958474
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.