10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
19 CFR 174.31; where protest denied in full, protestant may seek further review by filing a civil action in the United States Court of International Trade; 28 U.S.C. 2632; San Francisco Newspaper Co. v. United States, 9 CIT 517 (1985).
Issued September 4, 1992 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboard95 952021 (September 4, 1992)
Tariff classification
Product description
19 CFR 174.31; where protest denied in full, protestant may seek further review by filing a civil action in the United States Court of International Trade; 28 U.S.C. 2632; San Francisco Newspaper Co. v. United States, 9 CIT 517 (1985).
Full text
HQ 952021 September 4, 1992 CLA-2 CO:R:C:T 952021 SK CATEGORY: Classification Philip E. Busch Value Vinyls 645 St. Charles Court Arlington, TX 76013 RE: 19 CFR 174.31; where protest denied in full, protestant may seek further review by filing a civil action in the United States Court of International Trade; 28 U.S.C. 2632; San Francisco Newspaper Co. v. United States, 9 CIT 517 (1985). Dear Mr. Busch: This is in response to your letter of May 27, 1992, requesting reconsideration of a protest review decision issued by this office in Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 950889, dated April 20, 1992. Protest number 5501-89-000081 was denied in full. The appropriate forum, should you seek further review of the protest's denial, is the United States Court of International Trade. Section 174.31 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 174.31) provides for judicial review of denial of protest and reads: Any person whose protest has been denied, in whole or in part, may contest the denial by filing a civil action in the United States Court of International Trade in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 2632 within 180 days after - (a) The date of mailing of notice of denial, in whole or in part, of a protest, or (b) The date a protest, for which accelerated disposition was requested, is deemed to have been denied in accordance with Section 174.22(d). Customs does not have the authority to further administratively consider this issue. (See San Francisco Newspaper Co. v. United States, 9 CIT 517 (1985)). The final - 2 - disposition of this matter had been reached in the denial of protest issued by this office on April 20, 1992. Any further review must be in accordance with the Section 174.31 of the Customs Regulations set forth above. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division
More rulings on the same tariff codes
RE: First Sale; Multi-Tiered Transactions; Related Parties; Beverage Equipment
RE: The country of origin of electrical appliance cords
RE: The country of origin of a steering knuckle
RE: The country of origin of a steering knuckle
RE: The country of origin of a multi-utility axe
RE: The country of origin of helium gas in non-refillable steel tanks
RE: The country of origin of fiber optic cables
RE: The country of origin of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pressure washer hoses
RE: The country of origin of pressure washer nozzles and a sewer jetter kit
RE: The country of origin of Ammonium Lactate Cream 12% in dosage form
Follow 952021
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.