951777 95 Ruling Active

Boots, snowboard; HRL 087842 modified

Issued May 13, 1992 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 6404.19.20

Headings: 6404

Product description

Boots, snowboard; HRL 087842 modified

Full text

HQ 951777 May 13, 1992 CLA-2 CO:R:C:M 951777 DFC CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6404.19.20 Ms. Pamela Jo Wadell Barnhart & Associates 10914 S. La Cienega Boulevard Inglewood, California 90304 RE: Boots, snowboard; HRL 087842 modified Dear Ms. Waddell: In Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 087842 dated November 30, 1990, you were advised that the certain "Alpine" snowboard boots are classifiable under subheading 6404.11.90, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) as footwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of textile materials, sports footwear, valued over $12 per pair. The applicable rate of duty for this provision is 20% ad valorem. In HRL 089162 dated April 29, 1992, copy enclosed, Customs ruled that certain snowboard boots with outer soles of rubber or plastics and uppers of textile materials are properly classifiable as protective footwear under subheading 6404.19.20, HTSUS, with duty at the rate of 37.5% ad valorem. For the reasons stated in HRL 089162, it is now our position that "Alpine" style snowboard boots are properly classifiable under subheading 6404.19.20, HTSUS, as footwear with outer soles of rubber or plastics, and uppers of textile materials, other, footwear designed to be worn over, or in lieu of, other footwear as a protection against water, oil, grease or chemicals or cold or inclement weather. -2- This notice to you should be considered a modification of HRL 087842. It is not to be applied retroactively to that ruling and will not therefore, affect past transactions for the importation of your merchandise under that ruling. However, for the purposes of future transactions in the merchandise of this type HRL 087842 will not be valid precedent. We recognize that pending transactions may be adversely affected by this modification, in that current contracts for importations arriving at a port subsequent to this decision will be classified pursuant to it. If such a situation arises, you may, at your discretion notify this office and apply for relief from the binding effect of this decision as may be warranted by the circumstances. Sincerely John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division Enclosure

View original on CBP CROSS →

Ruling history

More rulings on the same tariff codes

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.

Book a demo →