10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
Snowboard boots; HRL 087545 modified
Issued May 13, 1992 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboard95 951772 (May 13, 1992)
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 6402.91.50, 6402.19.90, 6404.19.20, 3839, 1992, 1991
Product description
Snowboard boots; HRL 087545 modified
Full text
HQ 951772 May 13, 1992 CLA-2 CO:R:C:M 951772 DFC CATEGORY: Classification Ms. Sheryl Burgard Charles M. Schayer & Co. 3839 Newport Street Denver, Colorado 80238 RE: Snowboard boots; HRL 087545 modified Dear Ms. Burgard: In Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 087545 dated February 13, 1991, you were advised that certain snowboard boots with an outer shell of plastics, an inner insulating liner, hook and loop closures and a lug sole, are classifiable in subheading 6402.19.90, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), as other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics, sports footwear, other, valued over $12 per pair. The applicable rate of duty for this provision is 20% ad valorem. In HRL 089162 dated April 29, 1992, copy enclosed, Customs ruled that certain snowboard boots with outer soles of rubber or plastics and uppers of textile materials are properly classifiable as protective footwear under subheading 6404.19.20, HTSUS, with duty at the rate of 37.5% ad valorem. For the reasons stated in HRL 089162, it is now our position that the snowboard boots which were the subject of HRL 087545 are properly classifiable under subheading 6402.91.50, HTSUS, as other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics, covering the ankle, other, footwear designed to be worn over, or in lieu of, other footwear as a protection against water, oil, grease or chemicals or cold or inclement weather. The applicable rate of duty for this provision is 37.5% ad valorem. -2- This notice to you should be considered a modification of HRL 087545. It is not to be applied retroactively to that ruling and will not therefore, affect past transactions for the importation of your merchandise under that ruling. However, for the purposes of future transactions in the merchandise of this type, HRL 087545 will not be valid precedent. We recognize that pending transactions may be adversely affected by this modification, in that current contracts for importations arriving at a port subsequent to this decision will be classified pursuant to it. If such a situation arises, you may, at your discretion notify this office and apply for relief from the binding effect of this decision as may be warranted by the circumstances. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division Enclosure 6cc AD NY Seaport 1cc Eric Francke NY Seaport 1cc John Durant 1cc Fred Miller port of Denver 1cc Port Dir Denver
Ruling history
More rulings on the same tariff codes
The country of origin of Zonisamide Capsules, USP in dosage form
The country of origin of a fan assembly
The country of origin of a 30-Inch Extendable Fire Poker
The country of origin of three oven lamps
The country of origin of Norethindrone Acetate Tablets
The country of origin of an 18" Indexing Flat Pry Bar
The country of origin of an Electronic Shelf Label
The country of origin of a single-use, medical tubing set.
The country of origin of a garden cart
The country of origin of Tretinoin Gel, USP 0.025%, in dosage form
Follow 951772
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.