Woven sheeting material; strip; coated with plastics; Note2, Chapter 59; visible to the naked eye.
Issued April 24, 1992 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 5407.20.0000
Headings: 5407
Product description
The merchandise at issue is a woven sheeting material made from clear, 1,000 denier polyethylene strip with a 10 x 10 count. The sheeting material has been coated on both sides with white polyethylene plastics with a thickness of 30 microns.
CBP rationale
Two headings are potentially applicable to the instant merchandise: heading 5903, HTSUSA, which provides for textile fabrics impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastics, other than those of heading 5902; and heading 5407, which covers woven fabrics of synthetic filament yarn, including woven fabrics obtained from materials of heading 5404. The scope of heading 5903, however, is restricted by Note 2, Chapter 59, HTSUSA, which provides in relevant part that heading 5903 applies to: (a) Textile fabrics, impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastics, whatever the weight per square meter and whatever the nature of the plastic material (compact or cellular), other than: (1) Fabrics in which the impregnation, coating or covering cannot be seen with the naked eye (usually chapters 50 to 55, 58 or 60); for the purpose of this provision, no account should be taken of any resulting change in color.... The woven strip fabric in question has been coated with plastics; however, the coating cannot be seen by the naked eye. While the application of the plastics coating has altered the appearance of the strip from a clear to a white finish, Note 2(a), Chapter 59 specifically directs that changes in color should be ignored in determining whether a fabric is coated for tariff purposes. In Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 085350 dated March 2, 1990, we stated that: There is no indication in the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, Explanatory Notes, which is the official interpretation of the HTSUSA at the international level, on how the "naked eye" test should be applied. Accordingly, it is Customs (sic) position that, in the absence of legislative intent, the plain meaning of the statutory language will be given effect. If what the unaided eye perceives when viewing a fabric with a plastics application is nothing more than what would be perceived if a dye had been applied to the fabric, then the fabric is not coated for purposes of Note 2 of Chapter 59. However, if the unaided eye perceives the existence of an added substance, then that substance qualifies as a "coating or covering" within the purview of Note 2, provided that the plastics is spread over the entire surface of the fabric. Here the application of a white plastics coating is akin to a dye; it is no more visible than the clear coatings which have previously been the subject of rulings issued by this office. E.g., HRL 950542 dated March 2, 1992; HRL 088313 dated August 2, 1991; HRL 087388 dated October 5, 1990; HRL 087250; and HRL 086644 dated June 1, 1990. Furthermore, the coating has not obscured the underlying weave of the fabric nor is it visible under magnification. Accordingly, it is Customs' view that the strip fabric in question is not coated for tariff purposes.
Full text
HQ 950931 April 24, 1992 CLA-2 CO:R:C:T 950931 CRS CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 5407.20.0000 David R. Amerine, Esq. Brownstein Zeidman & Schomer Suite 900 1401 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-2102 RE: Woven sheeting material; strip; coated with plastics; Note 2, Chapter 59; visible to the naked eye. Dear Mr. Amerine: This is in reply to your letter dated December 27, 1991, on behalf of Calsak Corporation, in which you requested a tariff classification ruling under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). FACTS: The merchandise at issue is a woven sheeting material made from clear, 1,000 denier polyethylene strip with a 10 x 10 count. The sheeting material has been coated on both sides with white polyethylene plastics with a thickness of 30 microns. ISSUE: The issue presented is whether the plastic coating applied to the sheeting material in question is visible to the naked eye such that the material is classifiable for tariff purposes as a coated fabric. LAW AND ANALYSIS: Two headings are potentially applicable to the instant merchandise: heading 5903, HTSUSA, which provides for textile fabrics impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastics, other than those of heading 5902; and heading 5407, which covers woven fabrics of synthetic filament yarn, including woven fabrics obtained from materials of heading 5404. The scope of heading 5903, however, is restricted by Note 2, Chapter 59, HTSUSA, which provides in relevant part that heading 5903 applies to: (a) Textile fabrics, impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastics, whatever the weight per square meter and whatever the nature of the plastic material (compact or cellular), other than: (1) Fabrics in which the impregnation, coating or covering cannot be seen with the naked eye (usually chapters 50 to 55, 58 or 60); for the purpose of this provision, no account should be taken of any resulting change in color.... The woven strip fabric in question has been coated with plastics; however, the coating cannot be seen by the naked eye. While the application of the plastics coating has altered the appearance of the strip from a clear to a white finish, Note 2(a), Chapter 59 specifically directs that changes in color should be ignored in determining whether a fabric is coated for tariff purposes. In Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 085350 dated March 2, 1990, we stated that: There is no indication in the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, Explanatory Notes, which is the official interpretation of the HTSUSA at the international level, on how the "naked eye" test should be applied. Accordingly, it is Customs (sic) position that, in the absence of legislative intent, the plain meaning of the statutory language will be given effect. If what the unaided eye perceives when viewing a fabric with a plastics application is nothing more than what would be perceived if a dye had been applied to the fabric, then the fabric is not coated for purposes of Note 2 of Chapter 59. However, if the unaided eye perceives the existence of an added substance, then that substance qualifies as a "coating or covering" within the purview of Note 2, provided that the plastics is spread over the entire surface of the fabric. Here the application of a white plastics coating is akin to a dye; it is no more visible than the clear coatings which have previously been the subject of rulings issued by this office. E.g., HRL 950542 dated March 2, 1992; HRL 088313 dated August 2, 1991; HRL 087388 dated October 5, 1990; HRL 087250; and HRL 086644 dated June 1, 1990. Furthermore, the coating has not obscured the underlying weave of the fabric nor is it visible under magnification. Accordingly, it is Customs' view that the strip fabric in question is not coated for tariff purposes. HOLDING: The merchandise in question is classifiable in subheading 5407.20.0000, HTSUSA, under the provision for woven fabric of synthetic filament yarn, including woven fabrics obtained from materials of heading 5404: woven fabrics obtained from strip and the like. It is dutiable at the rate of 17 percent ad valorem and subject to textile category 620. The designated textile category may be subdivided into parts. If so, visa and quota requirements applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected. Since part categories are the result of international bilateral agreements which are subject to frequent renegotiations and changes, in order to obtain the most current information available we suggest that your client check, close to the time of shipment, the Status Report on Current Import Quotas (Restraint Levels), an internal issuance of the U.S. Customs Service, which is available for inspection at your client's local Customs office. Due to the changeable nature of the statistical annotation (the ninth and tenth digits of the classification) and the restraint (quota/visa) categories, you should contact your local Customs office prior to importation of this merchandise to determine the current status of any import restraints or requirements. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division
Ruling history
Reconsideration of HRL 084804; Coated fabrics
Reconsideration of HRL 088313 (8/2/91); affirmed; polyethylene coating on fabric not visible to naked eye; Note 2(a)(3), Chapter 59; 5407, HTSUSA
Woven polyethylene strip coated with clear polyethylene filmis not coated for tariff purposes since coating is not visible tothe naked eye. HRL 087253 revoked.
Reconsideration of HRL 086644; polypropylene packing material coated with plastic; plastic not visible; not classifiable in Heading 5903; classifiable in Heading 5407
Reconsideration of HRL 084744 and HRL 086130; clear polyethylene coating on woven polyethylene fabric strips not visible; fabric strips not classifiable in Heading 5903
More rulings on the same tariff codes
The tariff classification of plain woven fabric made from polypropylene strip from China
The tariff classification of two roofing underlayment fabrics from India, Korea, Vietnam or China
The tariff classification of woven polypropylene and polypropylene/jute mesh fabrics, ten inches and 21 inches in width, from China and Korea
The tariff classification of oil bags and hay sleeves from India, Turkey or Mexico
The tariff classification of three plastic coated textile fabrics (tarpaulin type materials), from China.
The tariff classification of polyethylene woven fabric from Denmark
The tariff classification of polypropylene hay sleeves from India, Vietnam and/or China
The tariff classification of tubular woven hay sleeves from China.
The tariff classification of four roofing underlayment materials, from either India, Korea or China.
The tariff classification of roofing underlayment materials from India, South Korea or China
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →