1 newer ruling cite the same tariff codes.

Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.

897869 89 Ruling Active

The tariff classification of cotton gin motes from Australia.

Issued June 27, 1994 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Cite this ruling

Copies to clipboard

89 897869 (June 27, 1994)

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 5202.99.0090

Headings: 5202

Product description

The tariff classification of cotton gin motes from Australia.

CBP rationale

The applicable subheading for the cotton gin motes will be 5202.99.0090, HTS, which provides for cotton waste; other; other.

Full text

NY 897869 June 27, 1994 CLA-2-52:S:N:N6:351 897869 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 5202.99.0090 Mr. Christopher M. Crowley Cherokee Textiles, Inc. P.O. Box 3307 Spartanburg, S.C. 29304 RE: The tariff classification of cotton gin motes from Australia. Dear Mr. Crowley: In your letter dated April 22, 1994, you requested a tariff classification ruling. You have submitted a sample bag of cotton gin motes, which are a by-product of the cotton ginning process. They consist of reclaimable cotton lint mixed with bits of leaves and bark. They are not carded or combed. You state that the principal uses are in mattress and furniture padding, papermaking, blending and coarse yarn manufacturing. Our New York Customs Laboratory has determined that the submitted sample is gin motes. We assume (subject to confirmation at the time of actual importation) that this material has not been re-run through the gin to remove foreign matter. The applicable subheading for the cotton gin motes will be 5202.99.0090, HTS, which provides for cotton waste; other; other. The merchandise will be free of duty. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport 

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

Follow 897869

Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.

One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.