The tariff classification of a doll from China
Issued January 16, 1992 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 9502.10.4000
Headings: 9502
Product description
The tariff classification of a doll from China
CBP rationale
The applicable subheading for the "Mermaid" doll will be 9502.10.4000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for dolls representing only human beings: whether or not dressed: other: not over 33 cm in height.
Full text
NY 870064 January 16, 1992 CLA-2-95:S:N:N3D:225 870064 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 9502.10.4000 Mr. Billy J. Gwin Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. 1400 Exchange Building 821 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: The tariff classification of a doll from China Dear Mr. Gwin: In your letter dated December 17, 1991, you requested a tariff classification ruling on behalf of your client Ace Novelty Co., Inc. The sample received is identified as "Mermaid". "Mer- maid" is a doll measuring approximately 28 cm in height. The doll is made of plastic and has articulated arms, legs, waist and head. Her hair is long, curly and blue in color. She wears a two piece mermaid costume consisting of a halter like top and a long garment resembling the tail of a fish that covers her from waist to toe. In your letter you contend that a mermaid is a creature and should be classified under 9503. We do not dispute that a mermaid is a creature, however, the item for which you seek classification is not a true mermaid but rather a doll in a mermaid costume. When the costume is removed the figure is a complete representation of a human being. Therefore, the "Mermaid" will be classified as a doll. Your sample is being returned as requested. The applicable subheading for the "Mermaid" doll will be 9502.10.4000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for dolls representing only human beings: whether or not dressed: other: not over 33 cm in height. The duty rate will be 12 percent ad valorem. Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, states that all articles entering the commerce of the United States must be marked with the country of origin as permanently and conspicu- ously as the article will permit. The sample submitted to this office was found to be not legally marked. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.2704-94-102661, filed September 26, 1994, concerning theclassification of a product called "Locket Surprise Kayla".
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.2704-94-102662, filed September 26, 1994, concerning theclassification of a product called "Locket Surprise Barbie".
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.2704-94-102408, filedSeptember 1, 1994, concerning the classification of Poly PocketPencil Case Playset articles
Application For Further Review of Protest No. 3901-93-101757; Plastic Novelty Figures Designed For Cap or Lid Closures
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3001-95-100098, filed February 3, 1995, concerning the classification of toy action figures
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.3001-95-100346, filedMay 19, 1995, concerning the classification of various toycreatures and action figures
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.3001-95-100368, filedMay 23, 1995, concerning the classification of various toycreatures and action figures
Decisions on Applications for Further Review of Protest Nos.3001-94-100409, filed June 23, 1994; 3001-94-100499, filedAugust 9, 1994; 3001-94-100524, filed August 25, 1994; and3001-94-100644, filed October 27, 1994; concerning theclassification of X-Men and other Marvel toy creatures andaction figures
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.3001-94-100717, filed December 1, 1994, concerning theclassification of "Jumpsie" doll sets
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.3001-94-100755, filed December 27, 1994, concerning theclassification of X-Men toy creatures and action figures, X-Men Projector figures, and "Jumpsie" doll sets
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →