10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
The tariff classification of foil laminated paper bags fromCanada
Issued January 28, 1991 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboard85 859662 (January 28, 1991)
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 7612.90.1090
Headings: 7612
Product description
These foil laminated paper bags will be used in the packaging of food items.
CBP rationale
The applicable subheading for the foil laminated paper bags will be 7612.90.1090, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for aluminum cans, boxes and similar containers.
Full text
NY 859662 JAN 28 1991 CLA-2-76:S:N:N1:113 859662 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 7612.90.1090 Mr. Randy Brodsho Americana Brokers Sweetgrass, Montana 59484 RE: The tariff classification of foil laminated paper bags from Canada Dear Mr. Brodsho: In your letter dated January 11, 1991 on behalf of Bonar Inc. you requested a tariff classification ruling. The samples you submitted are foil laminated paper bags of various sizes. These foil laminated paper bags will be used in the packaging of food items. The applicable subheading for the foil laminated paper bags will be 7612.90.1090, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for aluminum cans, boxes and similar containers. The duty rate will be 5.7 percent ad valorem. Goods classifiable under subheading 7612.90.1090, HTS, which have originated in the territory of Canada, will be entitled to a 3.9 percent ad valorem rate of duty under the United States- Canada Free Trade Agreement (FTA) upon compliance with all applicable regulations. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport
More rulings on the same tariff codes
The tariff classification of aluminum cups and lids from Austria
The tariff classification of empty aluminum cartridges from France
The tariff classification of aluminum containers from Germany.
The tariff classification of a Water Lock Comp. from Japan.
The tariff classification of coin trays from China
The tariff classification of lipstick containers from China
Fujisawa injectables; 19 U.S.C. §1313(a); Anheuser-Busch v. United States; United States v. International Paint Co.; C.J. Holt & Co., Inc. v. United States; Ishimitsu v. United States; C.S.D. 79-40; C.S.D. 80-183; T.D. 77-126; T.D. 53873-0; HQ 220900
The tariff classification of an empty cosmetics case from China
The tariff classification of a container from China
The tariff classification of Tea from the People’s Republic of China.
Follow 859662
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.