The tariff classification of watches from various countries.
Issued August 2, 1995 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
Product description
The tariff classification of watches from various countries.
Full text
NY 812964 August 2, 1995 CLA-2-91:S:N:N6:344 812964 CATEGORY: Classification Ms. Patricia Haleman SMH (US) Inc. 1817 William Penn Way Lancaster, PA 17604 . RE: The tariff classification of watches from various countries. Dear Ms. Haleman: In your letter dated July 19, 1995, you requested a tariff classification ruling. You have submitted two samples. One is a watch case without a movement and one is a watch case with a movement. You have raised a question regarding gold-plating of your watch cases and crystals. You have described a specific process, PVD (physical vapor deposition) finish, and would like to know if this process constitutes gold-plating. The process is performed in a vacuum using different methods of physicochemical activation such as ion bombardment, sputtering, evaporation-condensation, etc. This process makes it possible to deposit very thin layers (1 to 3 um) of impurity-free components which frequently possess a high level of hardness. This process may at times use a small amount of gold and leave gold tone deposits on either the entire case or very small areas of the case or crystal. In order to properly classify your watches, you have asked: 1. Does the PVD process qualify as plating or should the watches be classified as "other?" 2. When the gold-tone PVD process is used only on the crystal, is the case classified as plated or should they be classified as other? It is our opinion that if the PVD process contains gold and it is used on the bezel or back of the case, the watch would be classified under the provision for gold-plating. If no gold is contained in the PVD process, then the watch would be classified under the provision for other. If the PVD process is used on the crystal, whether or not containing gold, the case would not be considered gold-plated. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Country of origin determination for a playmat, storage bin, and swaddling wraps with drawstring bag; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2) and 19 CFR 102.21(c)(4)
Country of origin determination for a furniture moving blanket; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(5)
Country of origin determination for a duvet; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(4); most important assembly or manufacturing process
The country of origin determination for an unfinished face mask; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2)
The tariff classification and country of origin for backpacks from Cambodia; 19 CFR 102.21 (c)(2); tariff shift
The country of origin of two types of utility blades from Vietnam.
Country of origin determination for a seat cushion; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(1); wholly obtained or produced in a single country
Country of origin and marking determination for microplush blanket; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2); tariff shift
Classification and country of origin determination for a bathmat; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2); tariff shift; 19 CFR 102.13; De Minimis
Classification and country of origin determination for tire cord; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2); tariff shift
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →