10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.

Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.

809700 80 Ruling Active

The tariff classification of a semiprecious necklace from China.

Issued May 8, 1995 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Cite this ruling

Copies to clipboard

80 809700 (May 8, 1995)

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 7116.20.1500, 7116.20.0500

Headings: 7116

Product description

The tariff classification of a semiprecious necklace from China.

CBP rationale

The applicable subheading for the semiprecious necklace, if valued not over $40 per piece, will be 7116.20.0500, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for Articles of.

Full text

NY 809700 May 8, 1995 CLA-2-71:S:N:N8:344 809700 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 7116.20.0500; 7116.20.1500 Ms. Christine Mangual Worldwide Concepts Industries Ltd. 2506-2508 Wisconsin Avenue Ellsworth Industrial Park Downers Grove, IL 60515 RE: The tariff classification of a semiprecious necklace from China. Dear Ms. Mangual: In your letter dated April 21, 1995, you requested a tariff classification ruling. The submitted sample, HLA-2, is an endless necklace measuring approximately 31" in length and made of quartz crystal and garnet chips. The applicable subheading for the semiprecious necklace, if valued not over $40 per piece, will be 7116.20.0500, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for Articles of...semiprecious stones (natural, synthetic or reconstructed): Articles of jewelry. The rate of duty will be 5.9% ad valorem. If the necklace is valued over $40, the applicable subheading will be 7116.20.1500, HTS, which provides for Articles of...semiprecious stones (natural, synthetic or reconstructed): Articles of jewelry: Other. The rate of duty will be 6.5% ad valorem. Your sample is being returned as requested. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

Follow 809700

Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.

One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.