10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN MARKING OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS
Issued March 23, 1995 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboard80 807044 (March 23, 1995)
Tariff classification
Product description
THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN MARKING OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS
Full text
NY 807044 March 23, 1995 MAR-2 S:N:N1:109 807044 CATEGORY: MARKING Ms. Kathy Stapleton Burr-Brown Corporation 6730 S. Tucson Blvd. Tucson, AZ RE: THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN MARKING OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS Dear Ms. Stapleton: This is in response to your letter dated February 8, 1995 requesting a ruling on whether the proposed marking "PHIL" instead of "PHILIPPINES" is an acceptable country of origin marking for imported small integrated circuits. A marked sample was submitted with your letter for review. The sample submitted is a very small integrated circuit. Based upon our examination of the submitted sample, we agree that the item is too small to be marked with the entire country's name. The marking statute, section 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), provides that, unless excepted, every article of foreign origin (or its container) imported into the U.S. shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and permanently as the nature of the article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. the English name of the country of origin of the article. As provided in section 134.41 (b), Customs Regulations [19 CFR 134.41 (b)], the country of origin marking is considered conspicuous if the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. is able to find the marking easily and read it without strain. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport
More rulings on the same tariff codes
RE: First Sale; Multi-Tiered Transactions; Related Parties; Beverage Equipment
RE: The country of origin of a multi-utility axe
RE: The classification, country of origin, marking, and eligibility of the United States-Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement (USMCA) of a high security type bolt seal.
RE: The country of origin of pressure washer nozzles and a sewer jetter kit
RE: The country of origin and marking of an automatic wristwatch from Japan
RE: The country of origin of a pressure washer adapter set and turbo nozzle
RE: The country of origin of pressure washer nozzles, foam cannons, and pressure washer guns
RE: The country of origin and marking of flavored pitted date snacks
RE: The country of origin of a rebuilt 22RE engine used in a Toyota Pickup
RE: The country of origin and marking of a ceramic honeycomb catalyst
Follow 807044
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.