10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.

Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.

803072 80 Ruling Active

The Country of Origin Marking of Footwear.

Issued October 18, 1994 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Cite this ruling

Copies to clipboard

80 803072 (October 18, 1994)

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 1304, 1950, 1930, 1994

Headings: 1304, 1950, 1930, 1994

Product description

The Country of Origin Marking of Footwear.

Full text

NY 803072 October 18, 1994 MAR-2-64:S:N:N8:347 803072 CATEGORY: MARKING Karen Zeuschel Pagoda 1950 Craig Road St. Louis, Missouri 63146 RE: The Country of Origin Marking of Footwear. Dear Ms. Zeuschel: This is in response to your letter dated October 5, 1994, requesting a ruling on whether the proposed marking "Made in Brazil" is an acceptable country of origin marking for imported footwear. A marked sample was submitted with your letter for review The submitted sample is a women's mid heel pump with a leather upper and a rubber/plastic sole. The country of origin marking is stamped on the inside of the upper at the front near the toe. To see the marking one must first tilt the shoe forward and then roll it slightly sideways to catch the light. The marking statute, section 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), provides that, unless excepted, every article of foreign origin (or its container) imported into the U.S. shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and permanently as the nature of the article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. the English name of the country of origin of the article. As provided in section 134.41(b), Customs Regulations (19 CFR 134.41(b)), the country of origin marking is considered conspicuous if the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. is able to find the marking easily and read it without strain. The proposed marking of imported footwear, as described above, is not conspicuously marked in satisfaction of the marking requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304 and 19 CFR Part 134 and is not an acceptable country of origin marking for the proposed importation. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR Part 177). Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

Follow 803072

Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.

One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.