556773 55 Ruling Active

Applicability of subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, to medical instruments exported to Mexico for packaging and sterilization

Issued January 7, 1993 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 9802.00.50

Headings: 9802

Product description

You state that your company is considering establishing a maquiladora operation in Mexico. You will send your Mexican subsidiary medical instruments for packaging, after which the instruments will be sterilized using ethylene oxide gas ("ETO"). The articles will then be returned to the United States for distribution. Additional information was obtained from you on December 15, 1992, during a telephone conversation with a member of my staff. All the articles in question are manufactured in the United States, after which they are warehoused until they are exported to Mexico for sterilization. The articles to be sterilized are in an "EZ Prep Kit" containing cotton swabs, bandaids, gauge, etc.

CBP rationale

Subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, provides a partial duty exemption for articles returned to the United States after having been exported to be advanced in value or improved in condition by means of repairs or alterations. Such articles are dutiable only upon the value of the foreign repairs or alterations, provided the documentary requirements of section 10.8, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 10.8), are satisfied. However, entitlement to this tariff treatment is precluded in circumstances where the operations performed abroad destroy the identity of the articles or create new or commercially different articles. See A.F. Burstrom v. United States, 44 CCPA 27, C.A.D. 631 (1956); Guardian Industries Corp. v. United States, 3 CIT 9 (1982). Tariff treatment under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, is also precluded where the exported articles are incomplete for their intended use prior to the foreign processing. Guardian; Dolliff & Company, Inc. v. United States, 81 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 4755, 455 F. Supp. 618 (1978), aff'd, 66 CCPA 77, C.A.D. 1225, 82, 599 F.2d 1015, 119 (1979). Effective November 9, 1992, Customs modified its position regarding sterilization of surgical items under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, to reflect that such articles, unsterilized, are entirely unsuitable for their intended use in the United States and are therefore not entitled to a partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS. See, C.S.D. 92-35, Customs Bulletin and Decisions Vol 26, No. 42 (October 14, 1992). In the instant case, we find that the medical instruments exported to Mexico for sterilization and returned to the United States are not entitled to a partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS. It is our opinion that exported, unsterilized medical instruments are not completed articles when exported because they are entirely unsuitable for their intended use in the United States without the sterilization. Additionally, it logically follows that an article must be completed before it is repaired or altered under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS. That is, the initial manufacturing process must be completed. In your case, the sterilization is part of the initial preparation of the article for its intended use. It is an intermediate processing operations performed, as a matter of course, in the production of the finished articles, i.e. sterilized medical instruments.

Full text

HQ 556773 January 7, 1993 CLA-2 CO:R:C:S 556773 RAH CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 9802.00.50 Mr. Rudy A. Pina R.A. Pina & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 2496 Nogales, Arizona 85628 RE: Applicability of subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, to medical instruments exported to Mexico for packaging and sterilization Dear Mr. Pina: This is in response to your letter dated June 11, 1992, requesting a ruling on whether certain medical instruments exported to Mexico for packaging and sterilization are entitled to a partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). FACTS: You state that your company is considering establishing a maquiladora operation in Mexico. You will send your Mexican subsidiary medical instruments for packaging, after which the instruments will be sterilized using ethylene oxide gas ("ETO"). The articles will then be returned to the United States for distribution. Additional information was obtained from you on December 15, 1992, during a telephone conversation with a member of my staff. All the articles in question are manufactured in the United States, after which they are warehoused until they are exported to Mexico for sterilization. The articles to be sterilized are in an "EZ Prep Kit" containing cotton swabs, bandaids, gauge, etc. ISSUE: Whether medical instruments exported to Mexico for packaging and sterilization are entitled to a partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, upon return to the United States. LAW AND ANALYSIS: Subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, provides a partial duty exemption for articles returned to the United States after having been exported to be advanced in value or improved in condition by means of repairs or alterations. Such articles are dutiable only upon the value of the foreign repairs or alterations, provided the documentary requirements of section 10.8, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 10.8), are satisfied. However, entitlement to this tariff treatment is precluded in circumstances where the operations performed abroad destroy the identity of the articles or create new or commercially different articles. See A.F. Burstrom v. United States, 44 CCPA 27, C.A.D. 631 (1956); Guardian Industries Corp. v. United States, 3 CIT 9 (1982). Tariff treatment under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, is also precluded where the exported articles are incomplete for their intended use prior to the foreign processing. Guardian; Dolliff & Company, Inc. v. United States, 81 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 4755, 455 F. Supp. 618 (1978), aff'd, 66 CCPA 77, C.A.D. 1225, 82, 599 F.2d 1015, 119 (1979). Effective November 9, 1992, Customs modified its position regarding sterilization of surgical items under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, to reflect that such articles, unsterilized, are entirely unsuitable for their intended use in the United States and are therefore not entitled to a partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS. See, C.S.D. 92-35, Customs Bulletin and Decisions Vol 26, No. 42 (October 14, 1992). In the instant case, we find that the medical instruments exported to Mexico for sterilization and returned to the United States are not entitled to a partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS. It is our opinion that exported, unsterilized medical instruments are not completed articles when exported because they are entirely unsuitable for their intended use in the United States without the sterilization. Additionally, it logically follows that an article must be completed before it is repaired or altered under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS. That is, the initial manufacturing process must be completed. In your case, the sterilization is part of the initial preparation of the article for its intended use. It is an intermediate processing operations performed, as a matter of course, in the production of the finished articles, i.e. sterilized medical instruments. HOLDING: Medical instruments exported to Mexico for packaging and sterilization are not entitled to a partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, when returned to the United States because they are not completed articles when exported to Mexico. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division 

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

N357726 February 9, 2026

-importation into the United States provided the documentary requirements of 19 CFR 181.64 are satisfied. The duties cited above are current as of this ruling’s issuance. Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided at https//hts.usitc.gov/. The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Custom

N353145 September 26, 2025

Applicability of 9817.00.98 and 9802.00.50 to costumes imported from Canada

H348824 August 27, 2025

Network Security Device; Country of Origin; Marking; 9802.00.50; 9802.00.80

N344700 January 13, 2025

The tariff classification and applicability of 9802.00.50 to steel tubing exported from the United States            (U.S.), sent to Canada for additional processing, and returned to the U.S.

N339565 April 23, 2024

The tariff classification of plastic portable water pet bowls and pencils from China with logos added in Mexico

H335651 December 27, 2023

Subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, Wooden Flooring

H328190 February 2, 2023

Country of Origin; Subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS; Section 301 Trade Remedy

H311202 January 5, 2023

Subheadings 9801.00.10, 9801.00.20, 9802.00.50, HTSUS; Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2506-20-100243; Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.

H325232 June 27, 2022

Refurbished solar panels; Subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS

H321591 November 3, 2021

Applicability of subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS; Algal Oil

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.

Book a demo →