10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
Protest No. 330790100050, contesting denial of duty-free treatment for components of a hearing aid system under subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUSA; parts; Nairobi Protocol
Issued December 20, 1990 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboard55 556383 (December 20, 1990)
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 9817.00.96
Headings: 9817
Product description
Protest No. 330790100050, contesting denial of duty-free treatment for components of a hearing aid system under subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUSA; parts; Nairobi Protocol
Full text
HQ 556383 December 20, 1990 CLA-2 CO:R:C:S 556383 SER CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 9817.00.96 District Director U.S. Customs Service P.O. Box 791 Great Falls, MT 59403 RE: Protest No. 330790100050, contesting denial of duty-free treatment for components of a hearing aid system under subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUSA; parts; Nairobi Protocol Dear Sir: This protest, filed by Fritz Companies, Inc., on behalf of Cochlear Corporation, contests the classification and assessment of duties by your office on components of Cochlears' Nucleus 22 Channel Implant System, a hearing aid system, under subheading 9021.90.4040, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). The issue raised is whether these components, when imported separately, are eligible for duty-free treatment under subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUSA, which provides duty-free treatment to articles specially designed or adapted for the handicapped. It is the position of Customs that this subheading does not apply to "parts" of these articles. Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 556179 dated December 9, 1991 (enclosed), an internal advice decision issued to your office, addressed the identical fact situation involved in this protest. In HRL 556179, Customs determined that the individual components of the Nucleus 22 Channel Implant System for the hearing impaired are not "parts", and, are eligible for duty- free treatment under subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUSA. Accordingly, you should grant this protest in full. A copy of this decision, and HRL 556179, should be attached to the Customs Form 19, Notice of Action, to be returned to the protestant. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Re: Affirmation of NY N346051; Applicability of Subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUS, to electric actuators from China
The tariff classification of Glide Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) from China
The tariff classification of a spinal fixation system, a surgical instrument system, sterilization containers, a pedicle screw, and a nut breaker from France
The tariff classification of Freestyle Comfort (FSC) Oxygen Concentrator component parts from China
The tariff classification of pedicle screw systems from Switzerland
The tariff classification of Polyaxial Pedicle Screws, MIS Extended-Tab Pedicle Screws, and Locking Set Screws from Taiwan
Classification and eligibility for duty-free treatment under Nairobi Protocol concerning battery chargers for oxygen concentrator from China
The tariff classification of a motorized wheelchair from China
The tariff classification of an eye tracker from China
Request for Reconsideration of N352402 – Fidget Blanket - Articles for the Handicapped, Subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUS;
Follow 556383
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.