Protest No. 2304-95-100053; Interest; Effective Date; Retroactivity; North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Implementation Act; Customs Modernization Act; 19 U.S.C. 1505(c); 19 U.S.C. 1514 Dear Sir:
Issued October 6, 1995 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
Product description
According to the file, the nine entries which are the subject of the protest, were filed from March 8, 1989 to June 7, 1991. Although the protest refers to liquidation on January 6, 1995, from the file it appears that all nine entries were reliquidated on January 6, 1995. The protest was filed on March 29, 1995. The protestant states that when duties in connection with these entries were refunded, interest was not paid. The protestant contends that the duties should have been refunded with interest, on the basis of the amendment to 19 U.S.C. 1505(c), effected by section 642(a), Title VI, Public Law 103-182 (the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act; 107 Stat. 2557, 2205). Further review was requested and granted.
CBP rationale
Initially, we note that the protest, with application for further review, was timely filed under the statutory and regulatory provisions for protests (see 19 U.S.C. 1514 and 19 CFR Part 174). We note that the issue protested is a protestable issue (19 U.S.C. 1514(a)(3), (5); see also Syva Co. v. United States, 12 CIT 199, 681 F. Supp. 885 (1988)). At issue in this protest is whether the amendment to 19 U.S.C. 1505(c) effected by section 642(a), Title VI, Public Law 103-182, is effective to entries filed before the effective date of that law but liquidated or reliquidated after the effective date of the law. As stated in the FACTS portion of this ruling, the entries under consideration were filed from March 8, 1989 to June 7, 1991. The effective date of Title VI of Public Law 103-182 is the date of enactment (December 8, 1993). The entries under consideration were reliquidated on January 6, 1995. Customs has thoroughly considered the applicability of the amendment to 19 U.S.C. 1505(c) effected by section 642(a), Title VI, Public Law 103-182. Customs position is that the amendment applies only to entries filed on or after December 8, 1993, and not to entries filed before December 8, 1993, and liquidated or reliquidated on or after that date. Enclosed is a copy of our ruling HQ 225576 so holding. This ruling is incorporated (by reference) into this protest
Full text
HQ 226309 October 6, 1995 ENT-1-03/LIQ-1-R:C:E 226309 IOR CATEGORY: Liquidation Port Director U.S. Customs Service P.O. Box 3130 Laredo, Texas 78044 RE: Protest No. 2304-95-100053; Interest; Effective Date; Retroactivity; North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Implementation Act; Customs Modernization Act; 19 U.S.C. 1505(c); 19 U.S.C. 1514 Dear Sir: The above-referenced protest was forwarded to this office for further review. We have considered the evidence provided, and the points raised, by your office and the protestant. Our decision follows. FACTS: According to the file, the nine entries which are the subject of the protest, were filed from March 8, 1989 to June 7, 1991. Although the protest refers to liquidation on January 6, 1995, from the file it appears that all nine entries were reliquidated on January 6, 1995. The protest was filed on March 29, 1995. The protestant states that when duties in connection with these entries were refunded, interest was not paid. The protestant contends that the duties should have been refunded with interest, on the basis of the amendment to 19 U.S.C. 1505(c), effected by section 642(a), Title VI, Public Law 103-182 (the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act; 107 Stat. 2557, 2205). Further review was requested and granted. ISSUE: May the protest in this case be granted? LAW AND ANALYSIS: Initially, we note that the protest, with application for further review, was timely filed under the statutory and regulatory provisions for protests (see 19 U.S.C. 1514 and 19 CFR Part 174). We note that the issue protested is a protestable issue (19 U.S.C. 1514(a)(3), (5); see also Syva Co. v. United States, 12 CIT 199, 681 F. Supp. 885 (1988)). At issue in this protest is whether the amendment to 19 U.S.C. 1505(c) effected by section 642(a), Title VI, Public Law 103-182, is effective to entries filed before the effective date of that law but liquidated or reliquidated after the effective date of the law. As stated in the FACTS portion of this ruling, the entries under consideration were filed from March 8, 1989 to June 7, 1991. The effective date of Title VI of Public Law 103-182 is the date of enactment (December 8, 1993). The entries under consideration were reliquidated on January 6, 1995. Customs has thoroughly considered the applicability of the amendment to 19 U.S.C. 1505(c) effected by section 642(a), Title VI, Public Law 103-182. Customs position is that the amendment applies only to entries filed on or after December 8, 1993, and not to entries filed before December 8, 1993, and liquidated or reliquidated on or after that date. Enclosed is a copy of our ruling HQ 225576 so holding. This ruling is incorporated (by reference) into this protest decision and made a part of it. A copy of ruling HQ 225576 should be mailed with the Customs Form 19 to the protestant, as provided below. On the basis of ruling HQ 225576, the protest under consideration must be DENIED. This ruling addresses only the effective date of the amendment to 19 U.S.C. 1505(c) effected by section 642(a), Title VI, Public Law 103-182, and not the substantive application of that provision. HOLDING: The protest is DENIED because the amendment to 19 U.S.C. 1505(c) effected by section 642(a), Title VI, Public Law 103-182 (107 Stat. 2057, 2205), applies only to entries filed on or after December 8, 1993, and not to entries filed before December 8, 1993, and liquidated or reliquidated on or after that date (see ruling HQ 225576, copy enclosed). In accordance with Section 3A(11)(b) of Customs Directive 099 3550-065, dated August 4, 1993, Subject: Revised Protest Directive, this decision should be mailed by your office, with the Customs Form 19, to the protestant no later than 60 days from the date of this letter. Any reliquidation of the entry in accordance with the decision must be accomplished prior to mailing of the decision. Sixty days from the date of the decision the Office of Regulations and Rulings will take steps to make the decision available to Customs personnel via the Customs Rulings Module in ACS and the public via the Diskette Subscription Service, Freedom of Information Act, and other public access channels. Sincerely, Director, International Trade Compliance Division Enclosure
Ruling history
More rulings on the same tariff codes
The country of origin marking of breast pump kits
Country of Origin; Finished Leather
Dutiability of License Fees for Software as a Service in Imported Vehicles
The country of origin and USMCA eligibility of bearings
The country of origin of a jute and cotton bag
Country of origin determination for a playmat, storage bin, and swaddling wraps with drawstring bag; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2) and 19 CFR 102.21(c)(4)
Country of origin determination for a furniture moving blanket; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(5)
Country of origin determination for a duvet; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(4); most important assembly or manufacturing process
Applicability of subheading 9811.00.60 to wearing apparel from China
The country of origin of drains, a connector, and an evacuator
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →