10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
PRESQUE ISLE; Vessel Repair Entry No. C41-0045009-6; Protest No. 4101-00-100102; Presidential Proclamation 5923
Issued July 21, 2000 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboard11 115006 (July 21, 2000)
Tariff classification
Product description
The PRESQUE ISLE is a U.S.-flag vessel owned by GLF Great Lakes Corporation. The vessel underwent various shipyard work at Port Weller Dry Docks, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada, during the period of July 1, 1999 – July 31, 1999. Upon completion of the work in question, the vessel departed for the United States and arrived at the port of Erie, Pennsylvania, on August 1, 1999. A vessel repair entry was timely filed. There was no application for relief filed with respect to the subject entry. Consequently, the entry was liquidated on February 11, 2000, in the amount of $385,596.00. A protest, dated March 15, 2000, was timely filed.
CBP rationale
Title 19, United States Code, § 1466 (19 U.S.C. § 1466), provides in pertinent part for the payment of an ad valorem duty of 50 percent of the cost of “…equipments, or any part thereof, including boats, purchased for, or the repair parts or materials to be used, or the expenses of repairs made in a foreign country upon a vessel documented under the laws of the United States…” In regard to the above-cited statutory provision, we note that pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 5923 of December 14, 1988, effective January 1, 1989, all such costs incurred in Canada were to be dutiable at a rate of 45 percent ad valorem and were to decrease at 5 percent increments on January 1 of each successive year until January 1, 1998, when duty on Canadian work assessed pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1466 was to be eliminated. With respect to the costs covered by the vessel repair entry under consideration listed as no. 1-8 on the CF 226, we note that all of them pertain to work incurred at Port Weller Dry Docks, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada, subsequent to January 1, 1998. Accordingly, these costs are non-dutiable pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 5923.
Full text
HQ 115006 July 21, 2000 VES-13-18-RR:IT:EC 115006 GEV CATEGORY: Carriers Chief, Residual Liquidation and Protest Branch U.S. Customs Service 6 World Trade Center New York, New York 10048-0945 RE: PRESQUE ISLE; Vessel Repair Entry No. C41-0045009-6; Protest No. 4101-00-100102; Presidential Proclamation 5923 Dear Sir: This is in response to your memorandum dated March 31, 2000, which forwarded for our review the above-referenced vessel repair protest. Our ruling on this matter is set forth below. FACTS: The PRESQUE ISLE is a U.S.-flag vessel owned by GLF Great Lakes Corporation. The vessel underwent various shipyard work at Port Weller Dry Docks, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada, during the period of July 1, 1999 – July 31, 1999. Upon completion of the work in question, the vessel departed for the United States and arrived at the port of Erie, Pennsylvania, on August 1, 1999. A vessel repair entry was timely filed. There was no application for relief filed with respect to the subject entry. Consequently, the entry was liquidated on February 11, 2000, in the amount of $385,596.00. A protest, dated March 15, 2000, was timely filed. ISSUE: Whether the costs for which the protestant seeks relief are dutiable under 19 U.S.C. § 1466. - 2 - LAW AND ANALYSIS: Title 19, United States Code, § 1466 (19 U.S.C. § 1466), provides in pertinent part for the payment of an ad valorem duty of 50 percent of the cost of “…equipments, or any part thereof, including boats, purchased for, or the repair parts or materials to be used, or the expenses of repairs made in a foreign country upon a vessel documented under the laws of the United States…” In regard to the above-cited statutory provision, we note that pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 5923 of December 14, 1988, effective January 1, 1989, all such costs incurred in Canada were to be dutiable at a rate of 45 percent ad valorem and were to decrease at 5 percent increments on January 1 of each successive year until January 1, 1998, when duty on Canadian work assessed pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1466 was to be eliminated. With respect to the costs covered by the vessel repair entry under consideration listed as no. 1-8 on the CF 226, we note that all of them pertain to work incurred at Port Weller Dry Docks, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada, subsequent to January 1, 1998. Accordingly, these costs are non-dutiable pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 5923. HOLDING: The costs for which the protestant seeks relief are not dutiable under 19 U.S.C. § 1466. The protest should be granted in its entirety. In accordance with § 3A(11)(b) of Customs Directive 099 3550-065, dated August 4, 1993, Subject: Revised Protest Directive, you are to mail this decision, together with the Customs Form 19, to the protestant no later than 60 days from the date of this letter. Any reliquidation of the entry in accordance with this decision must be accomplished prior to mailing this decision. Sixty days from the date of the decision, the Office of - 3 - Regulations and Rulings will make the decision available to Customs personnel, and to the public on the Customs Home Page on the World Wide Web at www.customs.gov, by means of the Freedom of Information Act, and other methods of public distribution. Sincerely, Acting Chief Entry Procedures and Carriers Branch
More rulings on the same tariff codes
Affirmation of NY N348411; Country of Origin of a Cosmetic Brush; Substantial Transformation
Ruling Request; U.S. International Trade Commission; Limited Exclusion Order; Investigation No. 337-TA-1392; Certain Oil Vaporizing Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same
The country of origin of an automotive alternator.
Appraisement of Zircon from Australia; Computed Value Method
The country of origin of Candesartan Cilexetil and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets USP, in dosage form
Ruling Request; U.S. International Trade Commission; Limited Exclusion Order; Investigation No. 337-TA-1392; Certain Oil Vaporizing Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same
Transaction Value; Transaction Value of Identical or Similar Merchandise; Imported Aircraft Engine Parts; No Sale
Country of origin determination for a playmat, storage bin, and swaddling wraps with drawstring bag; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2) and 19 CFR 102.21(c)(4)
Country of origin determination for a furniture moving blanket; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(5)
Country of origin determination for a duvet; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(4); most important assembly or manufacturing process
Follow 115006
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.