10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.

Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.

114876 11 Ruling Active

Vessel Clearance; 19 CFR § 4.75; 46 U.S.C. App. § 91

Issued December 6, 1999 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Cite this ruling

Copies to clipboard

11 114876 (December 6, 1999)

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 1999, 1991, 1984, 0105

Headings: 1999, 1991, 1984, 0105

Product description

Alaska Maritime Agencies is experiencing situations where a vessel is departing the United States bound to Japan. In addition to the Japan-destined cargo, the vessel is also carrying cargo bound to China. The vessel would like to file an incomplete manifest and shipper’s export declarations (SEDs) pursuant to 19 CFR § 4.75(a) and (b), notwithstanding the fact that some of the cargo it is transporting is bound to China, a country listed in 19 CFR § 4.75(c) as one to which a vessel may not be cleared until a complete manifest and SEDs are filed.

CBP rationale

Section 4.75, Customs Regulations (19 CFR § 4.75), promulgated pursuant to 46 U.S.C. App. § 91, provides for vessel clearance procedures pertaining to the filing of incomplete manifests and SEDs. Specifically, §§ 4.75(a) and (b) collectively state that, with the exception of those countries listed in § 4.75(c) for which vessels may not be cleared until complete manifests and SEDs are filed, a vessel may clear Customs incomplete provided the missing documentation is submitted to Customs not later than the fourth business day after clearance. The language of § 4.75(c) relates to the vessel, not to the merchandise the vessel is transporting. Accordingly, if a vessel is clearing for a country not listed in § 4.75(c) (e.g., Japan) but nonetheless will subsequently proceed to a country that is listed in § 4.75(c) (e.g., China) later in its itinerary, the vessel may clear incomplete to the former. However, it should be noted that it is Customs policy that vessels carrying cargo subject to a Department of Commerce validated export license, or cargo subject to a Department of State export license because the cargo is on the U.S. munitions list, or cargo subject to a DEA license, should not be permitted to use the delayed clearance procedures in § 4.75(a) and (b). (See Telex of the Commissioner of Customs, dated November 28, 1984; see also Customs ruling letter 111438, dated January 24, 1991)

Full text

HQ 114876 December 6, 1999 VES-5-28-RR:IT:EC 114876 GEV CATEGORY: Carriers Lynda Ogden Vessel Operations Manager Alaska Maritime Agencies P.O. Box 920105 Newhall Building/Standard Oil Hill Dutch Harbor, Alaska 99692-0105 RE: Vessel Clearance; 19 CFR § 4.75; 46 U.S.C. App. § 91 Dear Ms. Ogden: This is in response to your letter dated November 4, 1999, requesting a ruling regarding Customs interpretation of 19 CFR § 4.75. Our ruling is set forth below. FACTS: Alaska Maritime Agencies is experiencing situations where a vessel is departing the United States bound to Japan. In addition to the Japan-destined cargo, the vessel is also carrying cargo bound to China. The vessel would like to file an incomplete manifest and shipper’s export declarations (SEDs) pursuant to 19 CFR § 4.75(a) and (b), notwithstanding the fact that some of the cargo it is transporting is bound to China, a country listed in 19 CFR § 4.75(c) as one to which a vessel may not be cleared until a complete manifest and SEDs are filed. ISSUE: Whether the requirement to file a complete manifest and shipper’s export declarations prior to vessel clearance pursuant to 19 CFR § 4.75(c) relates to the vessel or to the cargo it is transporting. - 2 - LAW AND ANALYSIS: Section 4.75, Customs Regulations (19 CFR § 4.75), promulgated pursuant to 46 U.S.C. App. § 91, provides for vessel clearance procedures pertaining to the filing of incomplete manifests and SEDs. Specifically, §§ 4.75(a) and (b) collectively state that, with the exception of those countries listed in § 4.75(c) for which vessels may not be cleared until complete manifests and SEDs are filed, a vessel may clear Customs incomplete provided the missing documentation is submitted to Customs not later than the fourth business day after clearance. The language of § 4.75(c) relates to the vessel, not to the merchandise the vessel is transporting. Accordingly, if a vessel is clearing for a country not listed in § 4.75(c) (e.g., Japan) but nonetheless will subsequently proceed to a country that is listed in § 4.75(c) (e.g., China) later in its itinerary, the vessel may clear incomplete to the former. However, it should be noted that it is Customs policy that vessels carrying cargo subject to a Department of Commerce validated export license, or cargo subject to a Department of State export license because the cargo is on the U.S. munitions list, or cargo subject to a DEA license, should not be permitted to use the delayed clearance procedures in § 4.75(a) and (b). (See Telex of the Commissioner of Customs, dated November 28, 1984; see also Customs ruling letter 111438, dated January 24, 1991) HOLDING: The requirement to file a complete manifest and shipper’s export declarations prior to vessel clearance pursuant to 19 CFR § 4.75(c) relates to the vessel, not the cargo it is transporting. However, if cargo licensing requirements apply as discussed above, complete filing is required notwithstanding the clearance of a vessel to a country not listed in 19 CFR § 4.75(c). Sincerely, Jerry Laderberg Chief Entry Procedures and Carriers Branch

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

Follow 114876

Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.

One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.