10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.

Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.

114425 11 Ruling Active

Coastwise Trade; Cruise Itinerary; 46 U.S.C. App.  289

Issued August 17, 1998 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Cite this ruling

Copies to clipboard

11 114425 (August 17, 1998)

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 1998

Headings: 1998

Product description

Holland America Line is interested in the possibility of using the following itinerary for future cruises on board its foreign-flag vessels: Embark passengers in Fort Lauderdale, Florida Ports of call: Georgetown, Grand Cayman Transit Panama Canal Puerto Caldera, Costa Rica Acapulco, Mexico Disembark passengers in Los Angeles, California

CBP rationale

The use of a non-coastwise-qualified vessel for the transportation of passengers in the above-described itinerary is violative of 46 U.S.C. App.  289.

Full text

HQ 114425 August 17, 1998 VES-3-02-RR:IT:EC 114425 GEV CATEGORY: Carriers Mike Bush Manager, Port Operations Holland America Line Westours, Inc. 300 Elliott Ave. West Seattle, Washington 98119 RE: Coastwise Trade; Cruise Itinerary; 46 U.S.C. App.  289 Dear Mr. Bush: This is in response to your letter dated July 9, 1998, requesting a ruling on a proposed cruise itinerary to be conducted by vessels of your line. Our ruling on this matter is set forth below. FACTS: Holland America Line is interested in the possibility of using the following itinerary for future cruises on board its foreign-flag vessels: Embark passengers in Fort Lauderdale, Florida Ports of call: Georgetown, Grand Cayman Transit Panama Canal Puerto Caldera, Costa Rica Acapulco, Mexico Disembark passengers in Los Angeles, California ISSUE: Whether the use of a non-coastwise-qualified vessel for the transportation of passengers in the above-described itinerary is violative of 46 U.S.C. App.  289. - 2 - Title 46, United States Code Appendix,  289 (46 U.S.C. App.  289, the passenger coastwise law), prohibits the transportation of passengers between points embraced within the coastwise laws of the United States, either directly or by way of a foreign port, in a non-coastwise-qualified vessel (i.e., any vessel not built in and documented under the laws of the United States and owned by persons who are citizens of the United States). Section 4.80a(b)(2), Customs Regulations (19 CFR  4.80a(b)(2)), promulgated pursuant to 46 U.S.C. App.  289, provides that a coastwise violation occurs if a passenger is on a voyage to one or more coastwise points and a nearby foreign port or ports (but at no other foreign port) and the passenger disembarks at a coastwise port other than the port of embarkation. (see 19 CFR  4.80a(a)(1)(2) and (4) for the definitions of the terms "coastwise port," "nearby foreign port," "embark," and "disembark," as those terms are used in the regulation) Under the proposed itinerary, passengers embarking a non-coastwise-qualified vessel at Fort Lauderdale (a coastwise point) and disembarking at Los Angeles (also a coastwise point) with intervening stops at Georgetown, Puerto Caldera, and Acapulco (all of which are nearby foreign ports) would constitute a violation of 19 CFR  4.80a(b)(2) as discussed above. HOLDING: The use of a non-coastwise-qualified vessel for the transportation of passengers in the above-described itinerary is violative of 46 U.S.C. App.  289. Sincerely, Jerry Laderberg Chief Entry Procedures and Carriers Branch

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

Follow 114425

Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.

One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.