8 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.
Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.
Modification of Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 082702; Basketball Shoe; external surface area of upper
Issued July 31, 1990 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Cite this ruling
Copies to clipboard08 087583 (July 31, 1990)
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 6403.91.9040, 6403.91.6040
Headings: 6403
Product description
Modification of Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 082702; Basketball Shoe; external surface area of upper
CBP rationale
HQ 087583 July 31, 1990 CLA-2 CO:R:C:G 087583 WAW CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6403.91.6040, 6403.91.9040 Ms. Karen M. Faus Avia P.O. Box 23309 Portland, OR 97223 RE: Modification of Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 082702; Basketball Shoe; external surface area of upper Dear Ms. Faus: This letter is to inform you that an error was made in the facts of HRL 082702 which was issued to you on February 6, 1990. In HRL 082702, Customs classified a men's version (822M) basketball shoe under subheading 6403.91.6040, HTSUSA, which provides for athletic footwear, in which the upper's external surface is predominately leather; in which the outer sole's external surface is predominately rubber or plastics; which is other than "sports" footwear; which lacks a protective metal toe- cap; in which the top of the upper covers the wearer's ankle bone; whose sole is attached to the upper by a means other than welt stitched construction; and which is larger than adults' American size 5-1/2 and worn only by males. The women's version (822W) basketball shoe was classified under subheading 6403.91.9040, HTSUSA, which is identical to the above subheading except that the shoe is worn by females in size 4 or larger. In HRL 082702, Customs described the merchandise in the following manner: The components of the shoe consist of: a leather toe cap, a leather vamp, leather quarters, a plastic strip attached from eyelet stay to eyelet stay around the back of the ankle for support, a hard plastic heel stabilizer, a padded vinyl collar, a vinyl tongue, a vinyl underlay basted to the vamp which extends to the heel, and a fabric lining with foam rubber padding. [Emphasis added.] Upon our reexamination of the merchandise at issue, we have determined that the collar and tongue of the footwear consist of a textile material instead of a vinyl material. Thus, we are modifying the facts of this ruling to read as follows: The components of the shoe consist of: a leather toe cap, a leather vamp, leather quarters, a plastic strip attached from eyelet stay to eyelet stay around the back of the ankle for support, a hard plastic heel stabilizer, a padded textile collar, a textile tongue, a vinyl underlay basted to the vamp which extends to the heel, and a fabric lining with foam rubber padding. [Emphasis added.] Please be advised that the modification of the facts of HRL 082702 does not in any way affect the classification of the sample footwear in subheadings 6403.91.6040, HTSUSA, and 6403.91.9040, HTSUSA. We have enclosed a copy of HRL 082702 for your reference. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division Enclosure
Full text
HQ 087583 July 31, 1990 CLA-2 CO:R:C:G 087583 WAW CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6403.91.6040, 6403.91.9040 Ms. Karen M. Faus Avia P.O. Box 23309 Portland, OR 97223 RE: Modification of Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 082702; Basketball Shoe; external surface area of upper Dear Ms. Faus: This letter is to inform you that an error was made in the facts of HRL 082702 which was issued to you on February 6, 1990. In HRL 082702, Customs classified a men's version (822M) basketball shoe under subheading 6403.91.6040, HTSUSA, which provides for athletic footwear, in which the upper's external surface is predominately leather; in which the outer sole's external surface is predominately rubber or plastics; which is other than "sports" footwear; which lacks a protective metal toe- cap; in which the top of the upper covers the wearer's ankle bone; whose sole is attached to the upper by a means other than welt stitched construction; and which is larger than adults' American size 5-1/2 and worn only by males. The women's version (822W) basketball shoe was classified under subheading 6403.91.9040, HTSUSA, which is identical to the above subheading except that the shoe is worn by females in size 4 or larger. In HRL 082702, Customs described the merchandise in the following manner: The components of the shoe consist of: a leather toe cap, a leather vamp, leather quarters, a plastic strip attached from eyelet stay to eyelet stay around the back of the ankle for support, a hard plastic heel stabilizer, a padded vinyl collar, a vinyl tongue, a vinyl underlay basted to the vamp which extends to the heel, and a fabric lining with foam rubber padding. [Emphasis added.] Upon our reexamination of the merchandise at issue, we have determined that the collar and tongue of the footwear consist of a textile material instead of a vinyl material. Thus, we are modifying the facts of this ruling to read as follows: The components of the shoe consist of: a leather toe cap, a leather vamp, leather quarters, a plastic strip attached from eyelet stay to eyelet stay around the back of the ankle for support, a hard plastic heel stabilizer, a padded textile collar, a textile tongue, a vinyl underlay basted to the vamp which extends to the heel, and a fabric lining with foam rubber padding. [Emphasis added.] Please be advised that the modification of the facts of HRL 082702 does not in any way affect the classification of the sample footwear in subheadings 6403.91.6040, HTSUSA, and 6403.91.9040, HTSUSA. We have enclosed a copy of HRL 082702 for your reference. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division Enclosure
More rulings on the same tariff codes
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from Indonesia
The tariff classification of footwear from Mexico
The tariff classification of a leather athletic shoe.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3307-97-100089, filed January 15, 1997, concerning the classification of hiking boots; High-Tech Sports, USA v. United States, Slip Op. 96-139, Slip Op. 97-24
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3307-96-100056, filed October 24, 1996, concerning the classification of hiking boots; High-Tech Sports, USA v. United States, Slip Op. 96-139, Slip Op. 97-24
Reconsideration of Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 081646. Footwear, athletic; Accessories or Reinforcements; HRL 081646 revoked
Reconsideration of HRL 084712 of August 24, 1989
Follow 087583
Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.
One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.