10 newer rulings cite the same tariff codes.

Classification can shift over time. Review the more recent rulings below before relying on this one.

085588 08 Ruling Active

Footwear

Issued December 20, 1989 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Cite this ruling

Copies to clipboard

08 085588 (December 20, 1989)

Tariff classification

HTS codes: 6404.20.40

Headings: 6404

Product description

The merchandise at issue is a woman's high heel shoe. The shoe has a textile upper and a plastic coated composition leather sole. The importer states that the leather sole is coated with a plastic spray of 0.05 mm. The material submitted states that the textile fabric of the upper and the rubber and plastic make up less than 50 percent (32.28 percent) by weight of the shoe. The shoe appears to be valued over $2.50 a pair.

CBP rationale

The definition of patent leather sets guidelines as to whether coated leather is plastic or leather. The Explanatory Notes constitute the official interpretation of the HTSUSA at the -2- international level. The Explanatory Notes to heading 4109, HTSUSA, define patent leather as leather coated with a non- transparent, lustrous, mirror-like coating that is considered to be leather if the plastic coating does not exceed 0.15 mm (6/1000 inch) thick, and as plastic if over that thickness. In Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 081839, dated July 06, 1988, it was held that the same 0.15 mm guideline is to be used to determine whether plastic coated leather uppers are considered to be leather or plastic for classification purposes. This ruling stated that if the uppers have a plastic coating of 0.15 mm or less they have an upper of leather, and if they have more than 0.15 mm they have an upper of plastic. Shoes that have a plastic coated leather sole are considered to have a sole of leather if the layer of plastic is 0.15 mm or less; and they are considered to have a sole of plastic if the layer of plastic is over 0.15 mm.

Full text

HQ 085588 December 20, 1989 CLA-2:CO:R:C:G 085588 SR CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6404.20.40 Mr. Charles Santarelli Mersant International Ltd. 158-12 Rockaway Boulevard Jamaica, NY 11434 RE: Footwear Dear Mr. Santarelli: This is in reference to your letter dated August 23, 1989, requesting the tariff classification of a woman's textile shoe, style "Talia", under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). A sample produced in Spain was submitted. FACTS: The merchandise at issue is a woman's high heel shoe. The shoe has a textile upper and a plastic coated composition leather sole. The importer states that the leather sole is coated with a plastic spray of 0.05 mm. The material submitted states that the textile fabric of the upper and the rubber and plastic make up less than 50 percent (32.28 percent) by weight of the shoe. The shoe appears to be valued over $2.50 a pair. ISSUE: Whether the sole of the footwear at issue is leather or plastic for classification purposes? LAW AND ANALYSIS: The definition of patent leather sets guidelines as to whether coated leather is plastic or leather. The Explanatory Notes constitute the official interpretation of the HTSUSA at the -2- international level. The Explanatory Notes to heading 4109, HTSUSA, define patent leather as leather coated with a non- transparent, lustrous, mirror-like coating that is considered to be leather if the plastic coating does not exceed 0.15 mm (6/1000 inch) thick, and as plastic if over that thickness. In Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 081839, dated July 06, 1988, it was held that the same 0.15 mm guideline is to be used to determine whether plastic coated leather uppers are considered to be leather or plastic for classification purposes. This ruling stated that if the uppers have a plastic coating of 0.15 mm or less they have an upper of leather, and if they have more than 0.15 mm they have an upper of plastic. Shoes that have a plastic coated leather sole are considered to have a sole of leather if the layer of plastic is 0.15 mm or less; and they are considered to have a sole of plastic if the layer of plastic is over 0.15 mm. HOLDING: The footwear at issue is classifiable under subheading 6404.20.40, HTSUSA, which provides for footwear with outer soles of leather or composition leather, not over 50 percent by weight of rubber or plastics and not over 50 percent by weight of textile materials and rubber or plastics with at least 10 percent by weight being rubber or plastics, valued over $2.50 a pair. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division 6 cc A.D. New York Seaport 1 cc Durant 1 cc legal reference

View original on CBP CROSS →

More rulings on the same tariff codes

Follow 085588

Get an email if this ruling is revoked or modified, or a newer ruling supersedes it.

One email per day at most. Confirm your address once, unsubscribe anytime.

Searching CBP rulings the smart way

Rulings are precedent. See which ones apply to your product: TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.