Reconsideration of NYRL 837350 of March 2, 1989
Issued July 21, 1989 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Tariff classification
HTS codes: 6102.30.2010
Headings: 6102
GRI rules applied: GRI 1
Product description
The sample at issue, style number 622 is a women's 100 percent acrylic knit garment which extends from the neck to just above the knees. The fabric is constructed with fewer than 9 stitches per 2 centimeters measured in the horizontal direction. The garment features a full front opening without any means of closure, a rib knit shawl collar, two side entry pockets below the waist, a rib knit bottom and shoulder pads. NYRL 837350 classified the garment under subheading 6102.30.2010, HTSUSA. You assert that the garment should be classified as a sweater under heading 6110, HTSUSA.
CBP rationale
Classification of merchandise under the HTSUSA is in accordance with the General Rules of Interpretation (GRI's), taken in order. GRI 1 provides that classification is determined according to the terms of the headings and any relevant section or chapter notes. Heading 6110, HTSUSA, provides for sweaters, pullovers, sweatshirts, waistcoats and similar articles, knitted or crocheted. You assert, based on Statistical Note 3 to chapter 61, that the garment at issue should be classified in heading 6110, irrespective of its length. Statistical Note 3 to chapter 61 states that for purposes of this chapter, statistical provisions for sweaters include garments, whether or not known as pullovers, vests or cardigans, which are constructed essentially with 9 or fewer stitches per 2 centimeters measured in the horizontal direction. This note is only to be used at the statistical level, that being the ninth or tenth digits of the tariff. As previously stated, classification is determined first at the four digit heading level, not at the statistical level of the tariff. It is our opinion that the Textile Category Guidelines act as an aid in determining the classification of garments. Those guidelines provide that sweaters cover the upper body from the neck or shoulders to the waist or below (as far as the mid-thigh area). Since the garment at issue exceeds the mid-thigh, we cannot classify under the heading providing for sweaters. You further allege that NYRL 837927 of March 20, 1989, classified a garment of 34-35 inch length as a sweater. That ruling in its description does not state anywhere the length of the garment. Since that garment was described as a sweater the classification was correct.
Full text
HQ 084359 July 21, 1989 CLA-2 CO:R:C:G 084359 DSN CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6102.30.2010 Ellen E. Rosenberg, Esquire Tompkins & Davidson 655 Fifteenth Street, N.W. Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 10004 RE: Reconsideration of NYRL 837350 of March 2, 1989 Dear Ms. Rosenberg: This ruling letter is in response to your inquiry of May 1, 1989, on behalf of May Dept. Stores, Inc., requesting reconsideration of NYRL 837350 of March 2, 1989, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). A sample produced in Taiwan was submitted for examination. FACTS: The sample at issue, style number 622 is a women's 100 percent acrylic knit garment which extends from the neck to just above the knees. The fabric is constructed with fewer than 9 stitches per 2 centimeters measured in the horizontal direction. The garment features a full front opening without any means of closure, a rib knit shawl collar, two side entry pockets below the waist, a rib knit bottom and shoulder pads. NYRL 837350 classified the garment under subheading 6102.30.2010, HTSUSA. You assert that the garment should be classified as a sweater under heading 6110, HTSUSA. ISSUE: Whether the garment at issue is classified under subheading 6102.30.2010, HTSUSA, or under subheading 6110.10.2030, HTSUSA. -2- LAW AND ANALYSIS: Classification of merchandise under the HTSUSA is in accordance with the General Rules of Interpretation (GRI's), taken in order. GRI 1 provides that classification is determined according to the terms of the headings and any relevant section or chapter notes. Heading 6110, HTSUSA, provides for sweaters, pullovers, sweatshirts, waistcoats and similar articles, knitted or crocheted. You assert, based on Statistical Note 3 to chapter 61, that the garment at issue should be classified in heading 6110, irrespective of its length. Statistical Note 3 to chapter 61 states that for purposes of this chapter, statistical provisions for sweaters include garments, whether or not known as pullovers, vests or cardigans, which are constructed essentially with 9 or fewer stitches per 2 centimeters measured in the horizontal direction. This note is only to be used at the statistical level, that being the ninth or tenth digits of the tariff. As previously stated, classification is determined first at the four digit heading level, not at the statistical level of the tariff. It is our opinion that the Textile Category Guidelines act as an aid in determining the classification of garments. Those guidelines provide that sweaters cover the upper body from the neck or shoulders to the waist or below (as far as the mid-thigh area). Since the garment at issue exceeds the mid-thigh, we cannot classify under the heading providing for sweaters. You further allege that NYRL 837927 of March 20, 1989, classified a garment of 34-35 inch length as a sweater. That ruling in its description does not state anywhere the length of the garment. Since that garment was described as a sweater the classification was correct. HOLDING: The garment at issue is classified under subheading 6102.30.2010, HTSUSA, which provides for women's or girls' overcoats, carcoats and similar articles, knitted or crocheted other than those of heading 6104, of man-made fibers, other, women's, textile category 635, and dutiable at the rate of 30 percent ad valorem. Due to the changeable nature of the statistical annotation and the restraint (quota/visa) categories applicable to textile merchandise, you should contact your local Customs office prior to importation of this merchandise to determine the current status of any import restraints or requirements. -3- NYRL 837350 of March 2, 1989 is affirmed. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division
More rulings on the same tariff codes
The tariff classification and status under the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA), of a women’s coat from El Salvador
The tariff classification of a men’s and women’s heated jacket from China
The tariff classification of woven and knit garments from Vietnam or Egypt
The tariff classification of men’s and women’s garments from Vietnam
The tariff classification of knitted jackets from Vietnam
The tariff classification of a women’s knitted jacket from Vietnam
The tariff classification of a women’s knitted coat from China
The tariff classification of a women’s jacket from Vietnam
The tariff classification of women’s jackets and a vest from Vietnam and China
The tariff classification of men’s and women’s heated woven jackets from China
Searching CBP rulings the smart way
TariffLens semantically searches all 200,000+ CBP rulings, surfaces the ones that actually match your product, and builds defensible classifications backed by ruling citations.
Book a demo →